Bug#560287:

2010-06-02 Thread Sergey Svishchev
This is a dup of bug 499167. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktil1me4oxxo_t0kpux_glk--jv6ijwphpovks...@mail.gmail.com

Processed: Re: Bug#560287: debian-policy: document dfsg, ds and debian suffix of version numbers when repackaging

2009-12-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 560287 developers-reference Bug #560287 [debian-policy] debian-policy: document dfsg, ds and debian suffix of version numbers when repackaging Bug reassigned from package 'debian-policy' to 'developers-reference'

Bug#560287: debian-policy: document dfsg, ds and debian suffix of version numbers when repackaging

2009-12-10 Thread Russ Allbery
reassign 560287 developers-reference thanks Thomas Koch writes: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.8.3.0 > Severity: wishlist > The proper use of dfsg, ds or debian as version number suffix in case of > repackagaged upstream tarballs is not documented anywhere. It's also not > clear, wether

Bug#560287: debian-policy: document dfsg, ds and debian suffix of version numbers when repackaging

2009-12-10 Thread Thomas Koch
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.8.3.0 Severity: wishlist The proper use of dfsg, ds or debian as version number suffix in case of repackagaged upstream tarballs is not documented anywhere. It's also not clear, wether the suffix should be appended with a point, a dash or a tilde. -- System Info