On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
It seems reasonable.
Seconded.
--
Ta
Santiago Vila writes ("Bug#62947: [PROPOSAL] s/debian-devel/debian-legal/"):
> Policy 2.1.6, "Further copyright considerations" says:
>
> [...]
>
>When in doubt, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be prepared
>to provide us with the copyright statemen
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
Seconded.
--
Digital Electronic Being
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
>
> I'm looking for seconds for this pro
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
> created to discuss copyright and licensing issues, the above reference
> should be changed to refer to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'.
I'm seconding this proposal.
--
Raul
Package: debian-policy
Version: potato
Severity: wishlist
Policy 2.1.6, "Further copyright considerations" says:
[...]
When in doubt, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be prepared
to provide us with the copyright statement.
Since the debian-legal mailing list exists and it was specifically
6 matches
Mail list logo
