On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:31:10PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Our Xaw-replacement handling is seriously pathological in every sense of
> > the term.
> >
> > This will no longer be a concern in woody. With XFree86 4.0.1, libXaw is
> > coming out of
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our Xaw-replacement handling is seriously pathological in every sense of
> the term.
>
> This will no longer be a concern in woody. With XFree86 4.0.1, libXaw is
> coming out of xlib6g and can be handled with the normal
> Conflicts/Replaces/Provides m
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I agree with the spirit of this proposal, but the wording should be more
> explicit about what happens if the package wishes to add its directory into
> ld.so.conf. The Xaw library replacements do that, but it's not regulated by
> the P
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 08:41:35PM -0500, David Engel wrote:
> > > Maybe we should define the default directories that every ld.so.conf file
> > > should contain - /lib /usr/lib /usr/X11R6/lib - and mark every other
>
> /lib and /usr/lib are always included implicitly, unless ldconfig is
> told no
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Maybe we should define the default directories that every ld.so.conf file
> > should contain - /lib /usr/lib /usr/X11R6/lib - and mark every other
/lib and /usr/lib are
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 01:15:19AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 04:17:18PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > > That is ld.so(8) on my system.
> > >
> > > Ditto. Actually, since we basically only use ELF nowadays, that
> > > should probably be replaced by "ld-linux.so(8
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 04:17:18PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > That is ld.so(8) on my system.
> >
> > Ditto. Actually, since we basically only use ELF nowadays, that
> > should probably be replaced by "ld-linux.so(8)".
>
> I don't know what ld-linux.so is. Please don't use it.
>
> Marc
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I propose prepending text like the following to section 4.3.
> > >
> > > Shared libraries
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:35:08PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I propose prepending text like the following to section 4.3.
> >
> > Shared libraries are .so files containing compiled
> > code that are loaded by th
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:14:17PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I propose prepending text like the following to section 4.3.
>
> Shared libraries are .so files containing compiled
> code that are loaded by the ld.so(5) library.
That is ld.so(8) on my system.
> They mu
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANAD. But I want to be... :)
In any event, I hope the following
change can be made so my package
(gdam at http://www.ffem.org/gdam)
can be made lintian clean.
11 matches
Mail list logo
