On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:14:23 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 15:47:56 +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: normal
>
> > I was recently told to split part of my Build-Depends field into a
> > separate Build-Depends-Indep field. Not one to fol
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 15:47:56 +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: normal
> I was recently told to split part of my Build-Depends field into a
> separate Build-Depends-Indep field. Not one to follow orders without
> question, I went and did some research, and found th
Hi!
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 18:12:50 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> in my understanding, it is planned that the autobuilders will call
> “build-arch”
> instead of “build” once enough packages support this target. According to
> Lintian's report, it looks like the goal is near reached.
>
>
>
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
usertags 727610 informative issue
severity 727610 wishlist
retitle 727610 debian-policy: update footnote of section 7.7 once the buildds
call “binary-arch”.
thanks
Le Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 03:47:56PM +0100, Ximin Luo a écrit :
>
> However, thinking about it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to debian-pol...@packages.debian.org (was ple...@debian.org).
> usertags 727610 informative issue
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: issue informative.
> severity 727610 wishlist
Bug #
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
I was recently told to split part of my Build-Depends field into a separate
Build-Depends-Indep field. Not one to follow orders without question, I went
and did some research, and found this snippet in the policy[1]:
"There is no Build-Depends-Arch; this
6 matches
Mail list logo
