Bug#846970: debian-policy: Proposal for a Build-Indep-Architecture: control file field

2017-08-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:56:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:47:47PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > 1. Debian does not currently have non-amd64 binary-all autobuilders > > > > Stating that binary-all packages in the archive are always being > > built on amd64 would

Bug#846970: debian-policy: Proposal for a Build-Indep-Architecture: control file field

2017-08-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:47:47PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > 1. Debian does not currently have non-amd64 binary-all autobuilders > > Stating that binary-all packages in the archive are always being > built on amd64 would actually document the current status quo, > assuming source-only uploads.

Bug#846970: debian-policy: Proposal for a Build-Indep-Architecture: control file field

2017-08-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 07:32:29PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Severity: normal > > Following a recent discussion on debian-devel[0], I'd like to > formalize the (XS-)Build-Indep-Architecture: header mentioned there. >

Bug#846970: debian-policy: Proposal for a Build-Indep-Architecture: control file field

2016-12-04 Thread Christoph Biedl
Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Following a recent discussion on debian-devel[0], I'd like to formalize the (XS-)Build-Indep-Architecture: header mentioned there. As an initial wording (probably 5.6.30): This header is useful in the rare case where Architecture: all packages cannot be