On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
> control: usertag -1 +discussion
>
> Hello Bastien,
>
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
>> Following #849830 and generally source-is-missing lintian problems
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 +pending
Bug #849851 [debian-policy] [debian-policy] Document that rules clean target is
not sufficient for removing dfsg problems
Added tag(s) pending.
--
849851: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact o
control: tag -1 +pending
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:40:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Well, if it's a common-enough error, I think there's no problem with also
> mentioning this in the section on the clean rule. It's not likely that
> this interpretation is going to change.
Okay.
> I'm on a
Sean Whitton writes:
> I don't think that it should be a point of Policy that the rules clean
> target is not to be used for this purpose, because it is entailed by the
> ftp-master's interpretation of DFSG plus this sentence that we already
> have in Policy:
> Every [source or binary] packa
control: user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
control: usertag -1 +discussion
Hello Bastien,
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
> Following #849830 and generally source-is-missing lintian problems
> could you document in 4.9 Main building script: debian/rules tha
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.8.0
Severity: important
Hi,
Following #849830 and generally source-is-missing lintian problems
could you document in 4.9 Main building script: debian/rules
that clean target must no be used for removing dfsg problem but the right
tools is repack
Thank you
Ba
6 matches
Mail list logo
