Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Guy Maor writes ("Re: Purging database packages"): > "Oliver Elphick" writes: > > I interpreted the sentence `No attempt is made to unwind after errors during > > removal.' to mean that exit status is not checked. Is that the case? > > ? I would

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-19 Thread Raul Miller
> >I thought it only implied one bit of configuration information somewhere > >under /etc/. Oliver Elphick wrote: > Yes, but this is a particular case of the general problem of interactive > installation scripts. Furthermore, this particular case is one that is a > bit extreme: on installin

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-19 Thread Oliver Elphick
Raul Miller wrote: >> >I would like to see a way to preemptively indicate that the >> >data should not be deleted. In a busy environment with several >> >sysadmins, you want to be able to make such decisions ahead of >> >time. > >Oliver Elphick wrote: >> This seems a good ide

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-19 Thread Raul Miller
Oliver Elphick wrote: > >> 3. Should there be policy on this matter for database packages in > >> particular? Raul Miller wrote: > >I would like to see a way to preemptively indicate that the > >data should not be deleted. In a busy environment with several > >sysadmins, you want to be abl

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-19 Thread Oliver Elphick
Raul Miller wrote: >Oliver Elphick wrote: >> 3. Should there be policy on this matter for database packages in particul >ar? > >I would like to see a way to preemptively indicate that the data >should not be deleted. In a busy environment with several sysadmins, >you want to be

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-18 Thread Raul Miller
"Raul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to see a way to preemptively indicate that the data > > should not be deleted. In a busy environment with several sysadmins, > > you want to be able to make such decisions ahead of time. Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't you us

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-18 Thread Jules Bean
--On Mon, May 18, 1998 12:46 pm -0400 "Raul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oliver Elphick wrote: >> 3. Should there be policy on this matter for database packages in particular? > > I would like to see a way to preemptively indicate that the data > should not be deleted. In a busy enviro

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-18 Thread Raul Miller
Oliver Elphick wrote: > 3. Should there be policy on this matter for database packages in particular? I would like to see a way to preemptively indicate that the data should not be deleted. In a busy environment with several sysadmins, you want to be able to make such decisions ahead of time. -

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-16 Thread John Goerzen
Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Oliver Elphick" writes: > > > case answer in > > y|Y|YES|yes|Yes) > > rm -rf postgres/data > > ;; > > Should you not add > *) echo "Purge aborted."; exit 1;; > > ? But that defeats

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-12 Thread Guy Maor
"Oliver Elphick" writes: > I interpreted the sentence `No attempt is made to unwind after errors during > removal.' to mean that exit status is not checked. Is that the case? ? I wouldn't have thought that was the case, but now am not sure. Guy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-12 Thread Roman Hodek
> When a database package is purged, the implication is that the data > stored in the database should also be deleted. Therefore I have > added the instructions to delete the data to postgresql's postrm. > > However, since it is possible to flag whole groups of packages for > purging when using d

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-12 Thread Oliver Elphick
Guy Maor wrote: >"Oliver Elphick" writes: > This is in the context of `postrm purge': >>case answer in >>y|Y|YES|yes|Yes) >>rm -rf postgres/data >>;; > >Should you not add >*) echo "Purge aborted."; exit 1;;

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-12 Thread Guy Maor
"Oliver Elphick" writes: > case answer in > y|Y|YES|yes|Yes) > rm -rf postgres/data > ;; Should you not add *) echo "Purge aborted."; exit 1;; ? Guy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-11 Thread Martin Schulze
On Mon, May 11, 1998 at 02:30:26PM +0200, Oliver Elphick wrote: > When a database package is purged, the implication is that the data stored > in the database should also be deleted. Therefore I have added the > instructions to delete the data to postgresql's postrm. > > However, since it is pos

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-11 Thread Bob Hilliard
Oliver Elphick writes: > Now, section 2.3.8 of the Policy Manual states that we should minimise > interactive prompting while installing; it does not even contemplate the > idea of prompting in the removal scripts. That section of the Policy Manual says, "Packages should try to minimise the

Re: Purging database packages

1998-05-11 Thread Scott Hanson
"Oliver Elphick" writes: > When a database package is purged, the implication is that the data stored > in the database should also be deleted. Therefore I have added the > instructions to delete the data to postgresql's postrm. > > However, since it is possible to flag whole groups of packages

Purging database packages

1998-05-11 Thread Oliver Elphick
I'm raising this issue in relation to PostgreSQL, but I am also copying to the maintainers of msql and mysql, for whom the same issues must be relevant. When a database package is purged, the implication is that the data stored in the database should also be deleted. Therefore I have added the i