Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, packages in the base system (i.e. those in base2_1.tgz)
> should not require a package outside of the base system to work, because
> otherwise the base system would be "broken". Whether this "requires"
> is just Depends or both Depends and Recommend
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> A while ago someone (Santiago iirc) filed a bugreport about packages
> depending on other packages with a lower priority. This made me
> wonder about allowed relations between packages. Reading the policy
> document does not give any explicit demands.
A while ago someone (Santiago iirc) filed a bugreport about packages
depending on other packages with a lower priority. This made me
wonder about allowed relations between packages. Reading the policy
document does not give any explicit demands. The only thing that
I am sure of is that a package m
3 matches
Mail list logo
