Re: X on the new TiBooks

2001-11-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 08:36:03PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > I've got X semi-working on my new TiBook using the fb driver, but the > colourmap is really screwed up. I'm working on extracting the Radeon M6 Sounds like about where I am. Wierd thing is the colourmap was fine when usi

Re: X on the new TiBooks

2001-11-18 Thread Christopher C. Chimelis
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:27:03AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > The framebuffer device should display any mode passed to it by the X > > server. Do you have an 1152x768 mode definition in your XF86Config > > (there is no such mode built into the serv

Re: X on the new TiBooks

2001-11-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:27:03AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > The framebuffer device should display any mode passed to it by the X > server. Do you have an 1152x768 mode definition in your XF86Config > (there is no such mode built into the server yet) and use that? I didn't - a couple people s

RE: Kernel 2.4 - serial/internal modem problem

2001-11-18 Thread Carney, Kevin
>The problem is that wvdialconf (and other dialers) won't wait long >enough for the modem to power up (which takes approximately 3 seconds >after opening the port). >You should configure wvdial manually, and make sure it has a longer >timeout when sending the init string. Thanks for the help! I

Re: X on the new TiBooks

2001-11-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2001-11-18 at 19:31, Mark Brown wrote: > Rather than try building and installing the CVS X server I've been > attempting to use the framebuffer X server together with a current > rsynced copy of benh's kernel. With any actual resolution an unviewable > image is produced (full screen 1152x

Re: X on the new TiBooks

2001-11-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 06:31:19PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > I've been trying to get my new TiBook set up for Debian. So far (thanks > to the guide Branden provided) the only real sticking point is X. Has > anyone got any suggestions on how to get the server running? Just to clarify - this is

Re: e2fsck - file system revision to high for this version

2001-11-18 Thread Andrew Sharp
Gerhard Reuteler wrote: > > After having built in a bigger disk to my pismo, I tried to make a bigger > /usr (/usrneu) with parted. Now the whole disk is recognized: > > pismo:/home/gerhard# mac-fdisk /dev/hda > 2.0G) Linux native > /dev/hda17Apple_UNIX_SVR2 /usrneu 50

e2fsck - file system revision to high for this version

2001-11-18 Thread Gerhard Reuteler
After having built in a bigger disk to my pismo, I tried to make a bigger /usr (/usrneu) with parted. Now the whole disk is recognized: pismo:/home/gerhard# mac-fdisk /dev/hda /dev/hda10Apple_UNIX_SVR2 / 303104 @ 3144 (14 8.0M) Linux nativ

X on the new TiBooks

2001-11-18 Thread Mark Brown
I've been trying to get my new TiBook set up for Debian. So far (thanks to the guide Branden provided) the only real sticking point is X. Has anyone got any suggestions on how to get the server running? Rather than try building and installing the CVS X server I've been attempting to use the fram

Re: IBM 6015-0U0 Installation Procedure

2001-11-18 Thread Chris Tillman
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 11:39:02PM -0900, James Zuelow wrote: > I have an IBM 6015-0U0, aka Power Series 400. This is my first PowerPC > machine, and I'd like to get Debian up and running on it if I can. As > far as I can tell, this is a PPC 601 machine that is PReP compliant with > Open Firmware

Re: Re: desperately searching for superblocks

2001-11-18 Thread blovett1
> From: Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > OK, you say it's finding the device - sda. Normally a list > of partitions is printed at this point under the heading > "Partition check:". Is your > dmesg saying this? What does pdisk -l /dev/sda say? Nope, I've got absolutely nothing under the Partiti

Re: Re: desperately searching for superblocks

2001-11-18 Thread blovett1
> From: Michael Schmitz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > WTF do you say swap is on sda4 above, then proceed to use > sda5 (your root fs) as swap space? It's not intentional-- that's just the error message I get back. If I try to mount the partition I get this: mount -t ext2 /dev/sda5 /mnt mount: /dev/s

Re: powerpc wmb()

2001-11-18 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi, > wmb is defined as > > #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("eieio" : : : "memory") > > however, ``eieio'' has no effect on memory, that is > Write Through Not Required, thus I think it should be > > #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory") While the original ppc spec

Re: powerpc wmb()

2001-11-18 Thread Momchil Velikov
> "Michel" == Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michel> Wrong list, try [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry. Thanks. Regards, -velco

Re: powerpc wmb()

2001-11-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2001-11-18 at 13:38, Momchil Velikov wrote: > > wmb is defined as > > #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("eieio" : : : "memory") > > however, ``eieio'' has no effect on memory, that is > Write Through Not Required, thus I think it should be > > #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sy

powerpc wmb()

2001-11-18 Thread Momchil Velikov
wmb is defined as #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("eieio" : : : "memory") however, ``eieio'' has no effect on memory, that is Write Through Not Required, thus I think it should be #define wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory") Comments ? Regards, -velco

Re: desperately searching for superblocks

2001-11-18 Thread Michael Schmitz
> I have an old-world power mac with swap on sda4, / on sda5, and MacOS on > sda6, and I've managed to screw up the filesystem horribly. I see from dmesg > that the drive is recognized, and I see from mac-fdisk that the partition > table is in fine shape. But none of the partitions are recogniz

IBM 6015-0U0 Installation Procedure

2001-11-18 Thread James Zuelow
I have an IBM 6015-0U0, aka Power Series 400. This is my first PowerPC machine, and I'd like to get Debian up and running on it if I can. As far as I can tell, this is a PPC 601 machine that is PReP compliant with Open Firmware (actually, when I boot to the firmware it says "Power Personal System

desperately searching for superblocks

2001-11-18 Thread blovett1
Help me help me! The potato is angry! I have an old-world power mac with swap on sda4, / on sda5, and MacOS on sda6, and I've managed to screw up the filesystem horribly. I see from dmesg that the drive is recognized, and I see from mac-fdisk that the partition table is in fine shape. But none