Re: XF86-Config-4 for Titanium PowerBook

2002-05-26 Thread Rogério Brito
On May 26 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 22:33, Rogério Brito wrote: > > It is both faster than X 4.1.0.1 and seems to support turning > > off the LCD's backlight, which apparently X 4.1.0.1 doesn't. > > Yep, I changed the drivers to use the framebuffer device for DPMS > with

PowerPC Support

2002-05-26 Thread Daniel Bolgheroni
Where can I find a list of old PowerPC computers supported by Debian PPC? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XF86-Config-4 for Titanium PowerBook

2002-05-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 22:33, Rogério Brito wrote: > On May 25 2002, Brendan J Simon wrote: > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > >My binaries are very unintrusive and easy to set up. See > > >http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/XFree86-4.2/ReadMe > > > > Do I need a special kernel ? I'm running a custom 2

Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

2002-05-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 10:58:13AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Michel =?ISO-8859- writes: > > On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 10:54, Rog?rio Brito wrote: > > > * Anything more than -O3 seems to be useless, I think Albert even > > suggested trying with only -O2 > > I suggest trying -Os as well. Some

Re: TiBook Woody configuration problems

2002-05-26 Thread Dimitris Dimitriadis
The error is: Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libopenldap-runtime_1%3a1.2.12-1.all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This happens while unpacking downloaded files after having run tasksel. --- On Sunday, May 26, 2002, at 05:10 PM,

TiBook Woody configuration problems

2002-05-26 Thread Dimitris Dimitriadis
I've looked through the archives and haven't found much on this, so here goes: After having net-installed the base system on my 500 TiBook, while trying to configuring, after selecting what I want my machine to do with tasksel, I get the following error: cannot configure libopenldap-runtime

Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

2002-05-26 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Michel =?ISO-8859- writes: > On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 10:54, Rogério Brito wrote: > * Anything more than -O3 seems to be useless, I think Albert even > suggested trying with only -O2 I suggest trying -Os as well. Sometimes it runs fastest, because smaller code fits in the instruction cache better.

Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

2002-05-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 10:54, Rogério Brito wrote: > BTW, I am using gcc-3.0 to compile xine-libs Have you tried 3.1? > and I added some extra options to the configure script > (-mfused-madd, -mcpu=750, -mtune=750, -O9). According to info gcc(-3.x): * -mfused-madd is the defau

Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

2002-05-26 Thread benh
BTW. Another place where you can get improved perfs is improving the memcpy's used to blit the Xv source image to the DMA buffers in R128DMA(). Currently, if using PCIGART, the target DMA buffers are cacheable. When using AGP, though, they aren't. In both cases, using FP registers to do the blit sh

Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

2002-05-26 Thread benh
> We can also look into getting an extra version of memcpy that > makes the transfers with floating point registers as some > people suggested on the Debian PowerPC mailing list. > > People there said that using floating point registers (which > are 64 bits large) inst

Re: [xine-user] [ANN] PowerPC Assembly Patch

2002-05-26 Thread Rogério Brito
On May 25 2002, Andrew Patrikalakis wrote: > Hello all, Hi, Andrew. > With all the recent talk of use of assembly on the PowerPC, I came > up with a patch to use assembly versions of memcpy. It's about 35% > faster. Here is a sample of the memcpy speed test (which also now > works):