Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, You might want to check out the dev list at YellowDogLinux. it seems by IBM decided to NOT allow its JIT to run with G4 and other non-IBM processors. There was a bit of a storm (i.e. I complained loudly and so did others on that list and on the IBM java newsgroup). I then had to

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, (sadly, the only one available to us ppc'ers) Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work (I use it to build OOo with) but you are right the Blackdown organization really could use some pleople that understand the PPC instruction set well-enough to help out

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, An aside ... we (ppc Linux) are really too small of a development community and we should really have just one shared development list to get what few of us are still active at least seeing/hearing what the others are doing. Kevin On Tuesday 02 September 2003 08:16, Kevin B. Hendricks

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi Sven, Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work (I use it to build OOo with) but you are right the Blackdown organization really You are speaking about OOo 1.0.3 or the new 1.1 stuff ? I maintain the Linux PPC port for OOo (...not for Debian, Jan does

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:27:14AM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: Hi, (sadly, the only one available to us ppc'ers) Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work (I use it to build OOo with) but you are right the Blackdown organization really You are

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du mardi 02 septembre 2003, vers 14:27, Kevin B. Hendricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work (I use it to build OOo with) Where did you get it ? The one I have is compiled with gcc 2.95, is

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:52:20AM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: Hi Sven, Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work (I use it to build OOo with) but you are right the Blackdown organization really You are speaking about OOo 1.0.3 or the new 1.1

several problems with Xserve, kernel and debian

2003-09-02 Thread Grzesiek Sedek
Hi everybody, I've got several problems with installing debian on Xserve (dual cpu). I've installed YDL first then debootstrap'ed basic debian. Config went ok and everything seems to be fine until when I'm trying to install kernel. I've build several kernel images (on my ibook) using my config's

Re: several problems with Xserve, kernel and debian

2003-09-02 Thread J. Javier Maestro
On Sep Tue 02 2003 15:58, Grzesiek Sedek wrote: Hi everybody, I've got several problems with installing debian on Xserve (dual cpu). I've installed YDL first then debootstrap'ed basic debian. Config went ok and everything seems to be fine until when I'm trying to install kernel. I've build

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:34, Sven Luther wrote: No, i am interested in building the debian OOo 1.1 packages, will give it a try next week, or earlier if i find time. Then look at the debian OO list or come to #debian-oo on freenode and help Gromit fix the remaining build errors ;) Ben.

Re: several problems with Xserve, kernel and debian

2003-09-02 Thread Grzesiek Sedek
This is not a problem, all the kernels had right filesystems compiled in. I'm doing it again, so I'll post more details when avialable. Many thanks! On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:10:07AM +1000, J. Javier Maestro wrote: On Sep Tue 02 2003 15:58, Grzesiek Sedek wrote: Hi everybody, I've got

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, Just check out the YDL mirrors in software/openoffice/ the last rebuild of the JDK is there. Kevin On Tuesday 02 September 2003 09:33, Vincent Bernat wrote: OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du mardi 02 septembre 2003, vers 14:27, Kevin B. Hendricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Of

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:37:22PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:34, Sven Luther wrote: No, i am interested in building the debian OOo 1.1 packages, will give it a try next week, or earlier if i find time. Then look at the debian OO list or come to

Re: several problems with Xserve, kernel and debian

2003-09-02 Thread Grzesiek Sedek
That could be an idea, What's the best way to check it? currently YDL kernel is working fine (under debian too, after coping kernel and lib/modules to new debian directory) any other kernel fail, I've used sources from 2.4.20-benh10 with my config and config from YDL and current sources

Re: several problems with Xserve, kernel and debian

2003-09-02 Thread ERDI Gergo
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Grzesiek Sedek wrote: This is not a problem, all the kernels had right filesystems compiled in. maybe your kernel uses devfs and your userspace doesn't, or vice versa -- .--= ULLA! =-. `We are not here to give users what \

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread William Crowshaw
Great Kevin! Thanks. The export line really did the trick. Can't wait to see if freenet and jedit run better! William --- Kevin B. Hendricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, You might want to check out the dev list at YellowDogLinux. it seems by IBM decided to NOT allow its JIT to run

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread William Crowshaw
--- Kevin B. Hendricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, (sadly, the only one available to us ppc'ers) Of course there is the Balckdown JDK 1.3.1 for PPC Linux that does work (I use it to build OOo with) Sorry, but I need 1.4.1 to run a freenet node. I didn't know you need java to

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread William Crowshaw
Oh, by the way, the fixed worked on my G3 upgrade card. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo cpu : 740/750 clock : 195MHz revision: 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202) bogomips: 599.65 machine : Power Macintosh motherboard : AAPL,7500 MacRISC detected as : 16 (PowerMac

Request for Kernel Patch to eliminate Retroactive Temporal Filesave Malfunction

2003-09-02 Thread Amont Informatique
What is a Retroactive Temporal Filesave Malfunction, or RTFM for short? Well, it's a well-known scientific fact that there is an emergent property of the IDE standard as implemented on most computers (and this is shared with SCSI) which affects the flow of time. It's all to do with relativity.

Re: [Q]IBM's Java 1.4.1 with IBM's JIT

2003-09-02 Thread J. Javier Maestro
On Sep Tue 02 2003 09:49, William Crowshaw wrote: Oh, by the way, the fixed worked on my G3 upgrade card. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo cpu : 740/750 clock : 195MHz revision: 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202) bogomips: 599.65 machine : Power Macintosh