Re: Hard Drive light

2004-12-05 Thread Jesus Climent
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:28:24AM +1100, Cedric Pradalier wrote: > > I attach a very small patch doing that. This a patch only for > drivers/ide/ppc/pmac.c file, > with respect to a pure kernel 2.6.9 from kernel.org > > It adds an entry in /sys/devices/ide-pmac/blinking_led > echo 1 > /sys/devi

Re: Hard Drive light

2004-12-05 Thread David Pye
On Sunday 05 December 2004 20:44, Cedric Pradalier wrote: > >> +pmu_blink_led_activated = newact?1:0; > > > >pmu_blink_led_activated = (newact != 0); > >is enough and more nice imho. > > I wanted to have either 1 or 0 in this boolean, not whatever int sent in > the buffer. Hi, (newact != 0) r

Re: TEST: Sleep patch #7

2004-12-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 12:18 +0100, eric.bachard wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > Not really the time, I am always using patch #1 on alubook 1,25GHz SD / > Debian sid :-)) ... > Just a question : is your patch only for 2.6.9 or is it both usable for > 2.6.10* ? It's not easily applied to 2.6.10* as-is, b

Re: Hard Drive light

2004-12-05 Thread Cedric Pradalier
According to Colin Leroy, on Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:42:33 +0100, >On 06 Dec 2004 at 00h12, Cedric Pradalier wrote: > >Hi Cedric, > >> +return sprintf(buf, "%c\n", pmu_blink_led_activated?'1':'0'); > >why not simply sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pmu_blink_led_activated) ? I like to ensure that whatever t

Re: clock and hwclock (was: Re: hwclock can't access /dev/rtc: solved)

2004-12-05 Thread Luca Bigliardi - shammash
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 08:18 PM, Joerg Sommer wrote: > > a possible solution could be done starting from this old thread: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/1999/09/threads.html#00254 > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/1999/10/threads.html#0 > > Interessting, especially that

Re: please recompile latest cernlib

2004-12-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 18:20 -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > > Could some developer please recompile the latest version of cernlib, > 2004.11.04-1, on powerpc and upload? This should take on the order of 2 > hours. I don't know why the buildd "voltaire" failed, but I suspect > it's a machine-spe

Re: installing debian on IBM 43P-150 (CHRP)

2004-12-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:10:27PM +0100, Yannick Buillas wrote: > Hi all, > > First, I'm Yannick from Annecy in France, new to the debian-powerpc list. > > I've tried Leigh's image on a 43P-260 (chrp, 1xPower3 cpu, no video card). > > As suggested, I've rebuild the iso with the -U option of mki

Buildd queue info [was: Re: please recompile latest cernlib]

2004-12-05 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Sean Neakums wrote: > "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> By the way, could someone remind me where I can find the buildd queue >> information that was formerly available at www.buildd.net? > > Perhaps http://buildd.debian.org/? Sorry, I should have been more specific. I'm awar

Re: TEST: Sleep patch #7

2004-12-05 Thread Colin Leroy
On 05 Dec 2004 at 21h12, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Hi, > Ok, here's the 7th version of the sleep patch for ATI based albooks & > iBook G4. Other machine users, please test too as it may cause > regressions (or improvements) as well. Still working fine :) -- Colin

Re: Hard Drive light

2004-12-05 Thread Colin Leroy
On 06 Dec 2004 at 00h12, Cedric Pradalier wrote: Hi Cedric, > + return sprintf(buf, "%c\n", pmu_blink_led_activated?'1':'0'); why not simply sprintf(buf, "%d\n", pmu_blink_led_activated) ? > + pmu_blink_led_activated = newact?1:0; pmu_blink_led_activated = (newact != 0); is enough an

Re: Hard Drive light

2004-12-05 Thread Cedric Pradalier
According to Benjamin Herrenschmidt, on Sat, 04 Dec 2004 09:22:36 +1100, >On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 10:53 +0100, Jens Schmalzing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes: >> >> > Any reason why it's disabled ? >> >> When it was off, people asked for it to be on. When it was on, others >>

Re: TEST: Sleep patch #7

2004-12-05 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 11:18:29 +, eric.bachard wrote: [...] > Just a question : is your patch only for 2.6.9 or is it both usable for > 2.6.10* ? > well, it does not apply to 2.6.10-rcX ... Soeren

Re: please recompile latest cernlib

2004-12-05 Thread Sean Neakums
Sean Neakums <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> By the way, could someone remind me where I can find the buildd queue >> information that was formerly available at www.buildd.net? > > Perhaps http://buildd.debian.org/? This appears to be the log for

Re: please recompile latest cernlib

2004-12-05 Thread Sean Neakums
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By the way, could someone remind me where I can find the buildd queue > information that was formerly available at www.buildd.net? Perhaps http://buildd.debian.org/?

Re: TEST: Sleep patch #7

2004-12-05 Thread eric.bachard
Hi Ben, Not really the time, I am always using patch #1 on alubook 1,25GHz SD / Debian sid :-)) ... Just a question : is your patch only for 2.6.9 or is it both usable for 2.6.10* ? Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit : > Ok, here's the 7th version of the sleep patch for ATI based albooks & > iB

TEST: Sleep patch #7

2004-12-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
(As usual, I'm cross posting several lists, please don't reply to all of them, and CC me as I'm not subscribed to all of them neither) Ok, here's the 7th version of the sleep patch for ATI based albooks & iBook G4. Other machine users, please test too as it may cause regressions (or improvements)

TEST: Sleep patch #6

2004-12-05 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
(As usual, I'm cross posting several lists, please don't reply to all of them, and CC me as I'm not subscribed to all of them neither) Ok, here's the 7th version of the sleep patch for ATI based albooks & iBook G4. Other machine users, please test too as it may cause regressions (or improvements)