On Aug 21 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld Pmacs,
since there are none-such?
False. PowerMacs 9500/180MP (which are OldWorld) are SMP, as the name
implies.
Regards,
--
Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:27:51AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld Pmacs,
since there are none-such?
Actually, there are. Apple even shipped a few of them that way, plus
there were upgrade cards available. I purchased a dual 200MHz
Hi Michel,
Am Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:46:14 +0200, schrieb Guus013:
Hi Sven,
..so you have to use some mac-os-x tool and remove the journal..
Which tool did you use?
If you have the Install CD/DVD Set or any other Installationmedia
for Panther, Jaguar and earlier won't work, you have to
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:27:51AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld Pmacs,
since there are none-such?
Actually, that's not true - I have a 7500 with an aftermarket 604e/180
dual CPU card, and I'm sure there was at least one 9600 model
On Sun, August 21, 2005 6:47, Derrik Pates wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:27:51AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld
Pmacs, since there are none-such?
Actually, that's not true - I have a 7500 with an aftermarket
604e/180 dual CPU
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:22:28AM -0500, vinai wrote:
On Sun, August 21, 2005 6:47, Derrik Pates wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:27:51AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld
Pmacs, since there are none-such?
Actually, that's not
On Aug 21, 2005, at 10:22 AM, vinai wrote:
On Sun, August 21, 2005 6:47, Derrik Pates wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:27:51AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Does it help to remember that SMP-safe is irrelevant to OldWorld
Pmacs, since there are none-such?
Actually, that's not true - I have a
On Aug 19 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
Humm, this is indeed a problem. :-( The non-freeness of miboot is
a secondary problem in face of not having a way to install the
operating system on the box. :-(
The kernel don't fit anyway,
On Aug 20 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
NewWorld Macs can boot off of CDs, so these boot floppies are only
necessary for OldWorld PowerMacs, which, being out of production,
have a fixed unchanging set of devices.
That is false, as you can obviously upgrade your box with other
devices and even the
FJP == Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FJP http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/inst/install
I can try this next - I don't run a lot of old Mac (legacy)
hardware or other PowerPC systems, but it should be easy to at
least sync with the install manual (at least get the
Hi there, vinai.
On Aug 20 2005, vinai wrote:
One thing to keep in mind is that the swim3 driver in the Old World
Pmacs hasn't been properly updated for the 2.6 series of kernels. Last
I checked, I think the driver now compiles, but I can't remember if it
even works. I'll take a look soon.
On Aug 20 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
Keep in mind that the *next* kernel will be even bigger. Sooner or
later, even the fully modularized minimum configuration isn't going
fit on a single floppy.
There is current discussion on the lkml discussing which kernels one
should use with small systems
On Aug 19 2005, Brendon Lloyd Higgins wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote (Thursday 18 August 2005 5:14 pm):
Which portable do you have?
Portable? I don't have any portable. You might've misunderstood me.
Oops.
Yes, perhaps I have misunderstood you. I was refering myself to the fact
that not all
On Aug 21, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Aug 20 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
NewWorld Macs can boot off of CDs, so these boot floppies are only
necessary for OldWorld PowerMacs, which, being out of production,
have a fixed unchanging set of devices.
That is false, as you can
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:47:16PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Aug 20 2005, Rick Thomas wrote:
Keep in mind that the *next* kernel will be even bigger. Sooner or
later, even the fully modularized minimum configuration isn't going
fit on a single floppy.
There is current discussion on
15 matches
Mail list logo
