Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 27 July 2006 03:35, Tomasz Grzegurzko wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~wouter/d-i/powerpc-miboot/daily/
I tried this image today (27-Jul-2006) and suffered the same fate..
The image from there from the 23rd of July worked for me on a g3 oldworld, so
Hi,
On Friday 18 August 2006 22:49, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
Hard to say, since Piotr and I have no deadline... :)
I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean,
Hi,
On Friday 11 August 2006 09:33, Simon Stapleton wrote:
On 10 Aug 2006, at 22:19, Holger Levsen wrote:
Yes, just using video=atyfb causes the same issue. There is a
difference somewhere in the way quik configures stuff and the way
BootX/miBoot do it, using video=atyfb (+ all the various
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Simon Stapleton wrote:
Yes, just using video=atyfb causes the same issue. There is a
difference somewhere in the way quik configures stuff and the way
BootX/miBoot do it, using video=atyfb (+ all the various gubbins)
from a BootX / miBoot
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Friday 18 August 2006 22:49, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:56:52PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Do you think it will be ready for inclusion in etch at release time?
Hard to say, since Piotr and I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Aug 2006, at 13:43, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Simon Stapleton wrote:
Yes, just using video=atyfb causes the same issue. There is a
difference somewhere in the way quik configures stuff and the
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 02:41:40PM +0200, Simon Stapleton wrote:
On 19 Aug 2006, at 13:43, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
It does not surprise me at all. It is not the fault of Quik, it is
simply that OF is completely broken on OldWorld PowerMacs. Those
machines were never intended to be booted from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Aug 2006, at 14:46, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
All that's missing for Wallstreets to boot from quik with accelerated
video, it would seem, is a little video hardware initialisation; that
step _should_ be derivable from the ATI documentation.
Hi Aurélien,
please don't cc: me - I'm subscribed to both lists, it's against the mailing
lists code of conduct (something you agree on when joining debian..) and it's
annoying. Thanks.
On Saturday 19 August 2006 14:05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by this. If you mean,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Simon Stapleton wrote:
Aye, agreed, although I'm not sure that it's _all_ done in the ROM,
ISTR from poking about in the miBoot / BootX source a while back that
it does a certain amount of video configuration itself. I wonder
what OSX's BootX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Aug 2006, at 15:33, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Simon Stapleton wrote:
Aye, agreed, although I'm not sure that it's _all_ done in the ROM,
ISTR from poking about in the miBoot / BootX source a while back
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:43:06PM +0200, Simon Stapleton wrote:
Yeah, I was looking directly at pre_boot_ppc.c, which seems to be
doing a bunch of register writes on ati cards. Apple's BootX seems
to do pretty much everything through the forth interpreter, which
makes it a bit tricksy
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:15:21PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
please don't cc: me - I'm subscribed to both lists, it's against the mailing
lists code of conduct (something you agree on when joining debian..) and it's
annoying. Thanks.
Sure, no problem and I apologise, which leads me to: how
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:15:21PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
I am also really afraid to interact with Frans, because I would rather
not be treated as dipshit like Sven was. :(
Frans is a nice guy. Just don't constantly throw dipshit like Sven did and
neither Frans nor anybody else will
Hi,
On Saturday 19 August 2006 16:17, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Sure, no problem and I apologise, which leads me to: how would I know
you are subscribed? ;)
Thanks for caring! :)
Of course you cannot know if someone is subscribed. But you can know that the
default is not to cc: people and
Does anyone know of an online tutorial, designed for laymen, on how to install and use miBoot? I'm tech-savvy but somewhat obtuse when it comes to compiling and all that, but I can get through the task (which is kind of fun, actually) once I have enough of a starting point. Unfortunately, I'm not
Hi Harold,
First things first, could you stop Cc'ing the bug-report
which goes to debian-boot@lists.debian.org and just reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, you will do me a favor. :)
Because we are (actually, I am) not welcome in debian-installer. I have
virtually (because I believe they can
My apologies for cc'ing everyone my fast few posts; thanks for making me aware I was doing that...This message is just to let you know that, deadline or none, it's quite alright with me however long it takes for you to produce the miBoot solution. In the meantime, I can continue using BootX -- not
On Aug 19, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Harold Johnson wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~wouter/d-i/powerpc-miboot/daily/powerpc/
floppy/
Still, I have to figure out how to make the physical floppies out
of these images. That I'm sure I can figure out, but it's unclear
to me whether they are
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On Saturday 19 August 2006 08:25, Tomasz Grzegurzko wrote:
I've just tried three more series from powerpc-miboot. The daily
(18-Aug-2006), the beta3 and 24-Jul-2006 (as I couldn't find 23 July)
and all failed sigh.
It is still the same problem; it cannot
On Aug 19, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Harold Johnson wrote:
In the meantime, I can continue using BootX -- not a real elegant
solution, IMHO, but it works.
Hi Harold,
What magic did you have to use to get BootX to boot a 2.6.16 kernel
for you?
Thanks!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
