Airport extreme and linux-2.6.25.

2008-08-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi all, I just installed Lenny and did not manage to get the wireless network working with the firmware produced by b43-fwcutter. Is there anybody who manages? I get error messages like this: Aug 3 14:49:26 sorbet kernel: [ 251.469974] input: b43-phy0 as /class/input/input16 Aug 3 14:49:27

Lenny Xserve-G5 Cluster Node install failure

2008-08-03 Thread Marc Zyngier
People, I finally found some time to give Lenny a run on my Xserve-G5 (Dual 2GHz, Cluster Node version). Just for the record, installing Debian (or anything non-MacOSX) on this box is not exactly easy, as there is no optical drive and no way to boot it reliably over the network. I ended-up

Re: Poor performance of G5 on GNOME's CPU benchmarks.

2008-08-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5 performs extremely bad: something like twice slower as an old 1.5 Ghz Celeron machine. For some other tests, the performances of the processors scale with the

Re: Poor performance of G5 on GNOME's CPU benchmarks.

2008-08-03 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5 performs extremely bad: something like twice slower as an old 1.5 Ghz Celeron machine. For some

Re: Poor performance of G5 on GNOME's CPU benchmarks.

2008-08-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 17:56 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5 performs extremely bad: something like

Re: Poor performance of G5 on GNOME's CPU benchmarks.

2008-08-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 05:32:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer a écrit : On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 11:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: The result is that on some particular types of computations, the G5 performs extremely bad: something like twice slower as an old 1.5 Ghz Celeron machine. For some