Hi Aurelien,
On 09/05/2014 02:33 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Now that we have debian-installer working, I have installed a VM with
it and tried to determine which packages are still missing to setup a
[...]
Thanks for the effort and the comprehensive list.
klibc #749060 some binaries
Steven Chamberlain dixit:
>On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
>>mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
>
>That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
>porting, upco
On 05/09/14 18:04, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> For example, src:glibc, has been fully built on sh4, yet:
> yamato:~# apt-cache policy libc6
> libc6:
> Installed: 2.19-9
> Candidate: 2.19-9
> Version table:
> *** 2.19-9 0
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
I can only find arch:all pa
Hi,
On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal*
>mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...]
That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about
porting, upcoming new ports, or any ports
Hello,
I recently read [1] about the new Debian architecture ppc64el.
I maintain a small tool "linuxinfo", which checks for the architecture
and prints some system information.
It would be kind if you could check on ppc64el [2] if linuxinfo works
and produces sensible output. If not, bugs or repl
Hi folks,
I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to
all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a
confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list
noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also
clearly meant to be di
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
> > I'd like to help fixing issues found during buildd of packages on ppc64el :
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=ppc64el&suite=sid
>
> Tha
Hi Aurelien!
I just noticed that there seems to be something wrong with
packages.debian.org regarding sh4. Many packages are not
listed there as available even though they are built and
installed.
For example, src:glibc, has been fully built on sh4, yet:
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libc6
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 01:53:01PM +0200, Erwan Prioul wrote:
> On 08/21/2014 04:26 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >I have started to put the known failures with a bug number, but if some
> >others can help with matching a build failure with a bug number that
> >would be great. Of course if t
On 08/28/2014 03:57 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> [...] In all the relevant tool chain tools it is
called ppc64le, and this is what other distributions (fedora / opensuse)
have adopted for this port.
A related funny piece for Friday :) from linuxppc-dev [1]:
'At least we're consis
10 matches
Mail list logo
