On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
> which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all
> porters should be aware of.
We have debian-devel-announce for that, the ex
Steve McIntyre dixit:
>>That seems like a bad idea to me, tbh. There will be people who won't
>>notice that the meaning of debian-ports@ has changed, and who will try
>>to use it with its old meaning.
>favour of the existing behaviour. If anybody does use try to use it
>that way in future, the ne
Hallo,
I have a lettux 400 und would like to discuss with other debian people
about the lettux 400.
Best wishes
Peter Felten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all porters
should be aware of.
It's not really that mails going to debian-ports@ appear that often.
PS: Excuse my quoting style, currently on mobile.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:38:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> >>Alexander Wirt dixit:
>> >>
Hi,
(haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >>Alexander Wirt dixit:
> >>
> >>>C
6 matches
Mail list logo
