On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:45:33AM +, Budweiser Gregor wrote:
> I was not aware of this. We are using the powerpc packages. I assume
> those are more generic builds (like i386 used to be).
e500 can't execute FPU code from generic powerpc as far as I know.
At least not 64 bit FPU code. Of cour
On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 10:03 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Gregor!
>
> On 9/2/20 9:21 AM, Budweiser Gregor wrote:
> > > Interesting, what hardware do you have?
> >
> > We have powerpc e500 (freescale) based embedded devices.
> That's what the "powerpcspe" port was for. It was unfor
Hi Gregor!
On 9/2/20 10:45 AM, Budweiser Gregor wrote:
> I was not aware of this. We are using the powerpc packages. I assume
> those are more generic builds (like i386 used to be).
Yes, the powerpc packages can be used as well but you won't get optimal
performance.
However, in case you compile
Hi Gregor!
On 9/2/20 9:21 AM, Budweiser Gregor wrote:
>> Interesting, what hardware do you have?
>
> We have powerpc e500 (freescale) based embedded devices.
That's what the "powerpcspe" port was for. It was unfortunately dropped because
GCC upstream dropped the backend [1].
Adrian
> [1]
> ht
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 15:14 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Moving to debian-powerpc as we are getting off-topic on debian-
> snapshot]
>
> On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 06:14 +, Budweiser Gregor wrote:
>
> > Our hardware does not support 64bit
>
> Interesting, what hardware do you have?
We have powerpc
5 matches
Mail list logo