Forgot the reference:
On 11/10/20 11:15 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Turns out that parted_server is crashing with a:
>
> free(): invalid next size (fast)
>
> in command_open() [1]. I don't know yet why that happens but that explains
> why the partitioning just hangs forever.
On 11/10/20 10:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 11/9/20 10:02 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Okay, that has been fixed and mounting the CD works again [1].
>>
>> But for some reason partman (the partitioning tool) is hanging now.
>
> So far I know that the "DUMP" command for
On 11/9/20 10:02 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Okay, that has been fixed and mounting the CD works again [1].
>
> But for some reason partman (the partitioning tool) is hanging now.
So far I know that the "DUMP" command for partman is hanging, i.e.
try executing "partman-dump" in
> On Nov 10, 2020, at 7:54 PM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
>
> Do you have a fix for partman also?
Not yet. That’s a completely different problem which will require some more
debugging.
Adrian
well done Adrian!
I'm sometimes not very smart ;-).
Will fix that. Working image by tomorrow.
Adrian
Do you have a fix for partman also?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:20 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> > $ ssh gcc203 getconf PAGESIZE
> > 65536
> > [...]
> > thouse gcc* machines are from 'gcc compile farm' [1] , ppc64 or ppc64le
>
> Ah yes. That's probably what i ask about.
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
>
On 11/10/20 7:01 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Ok, your syslog is actually complete. I was confused by your previous
> messages.
>
> Just sending the syslog file is enough, no need to send anything else.
>
> Anyway, the error is here:
>
> Nov 10 17:15:58 mk-hfs-bootstrap: `hformat -l
Hi,
Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> $ ssh gcc203 getconf PAGESIZE
> 65536
> [...]
> thouse gcc* machines are from 'gcc compile farm' [1] , ppc64 or ppc64le
Ah yes. That's probably what i ask about.
arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
/* ... For PPC64 we support either 4K or 64K software page size. ...
On 11/10/20 6:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Just grepping for GRUB doesn't help. We're just seeing
>
> "Configuring 'grub-installer' failed with error code 1"
>
> which is already something that we already know, i.e. "GRB installation
> failed."
>
> I need everything from the
On 11/10/20 6:47 PM, Stan Johnson wrote:
> $ fgrep -i grub syslog
> Nov 10 09:29:25 anna[2818]: DEBUG: retrieving grub-installer 1.173+mac
> Nov 10 09:29:28 anna[2818]: DEBUG: retrieving grub-mount-udeb 2.04-10
> Nov 10 16:46:35 in-target: linux-doc-5.9 debian-kernel-handbook mkvmlinuz
>
On 11/9/20 11:45 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 11/10/20 4:51 AM, Stan Johnson wrote:
Thanks for creating the 9 Nov 2020 CD. I was able to use that CD to
install Debian SID on a PPC Cube (G4) from an external Firewire CD
drive. ...
The
On 11/10/20 5:11 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 11/10/20 4:59 PM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
>> If I go to a console, I can see that the disk has five partitions (with
>> parted).
>> The strange thing is that if I issue a
>> fdisk -l
>> I do not see the partitions.
>
> Regular fdisk
On 11/10/20 4:59 PM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
> If I go to a console, I can see that the disk has five partitions (with
> parted).
> The strange thing is that if I issue a
> fdisk -l
> I do not see the partitions.
Regular fdisk doesn't support Mac partitions as far as I know.
That's by
If I go to a console, I can see that the disk has five partitions (with
parted).
The strange thing is that if I issue a
fdisk -l
I do not see the partitions.
I also see an error message in tty4 saying:
partman: no matching physical volumes found
Jeroen
On Nov 10, 2020, at 3:57 PM, John Paul
On 11/10/20 12:05 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 11/10/20 11:54 AM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
>> I see another image, produced on the 10th of November (today).
>> Do we need to test that one as well ?
>
> I already tested it. Same problem.
FWIW, I tested sparc64 and it works there. So
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:41 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> by incident one of my other kernel adventures leads me here, although
> it might turn out to be off topic, as i know too few about powerpc.
>
> Are there machines in use which really have regular memory page size
> larger than 32
On 11/10/20 11:54 AM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
> I see another image, produced on the 10th of November (today).
> Do we need to test that one as well ?
I already tested it. Same problem.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie
Adrian,
I see another image, produced on the 10th of November (today). Do we
need to test that one as well ?
Jeroen
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz schreef op 2020-11-10 11:17:
On 11/10/20 11:00 AM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
I tried the powerpc image produced on the 9th of November. I
experience
On 11/10/20 11:00 AM, Jeroen Diederen wrote:
> I tried the powerpc image produced on the 9th of November. I experience the
> same problem as Adrian: the partitioning tool is hanging. It says that it is
> scanning disks and stays at 47%. If I look in tty4 I see that it detected 5
> partitions on
Hi!
I tried the powerpc image produced on the 9th of November. I experience the
same problem as Adrian: the partitioning tool is hanging. It says that it is
scanning disks and stays at 47%. If I look in tty4 I see that it detected 5
partitions on sda: [mac] sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4 sda5. I cannot
20 matches
Mail list logo
