On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:40:10AM +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> Regarding the old 32 bit powerpc-utils, now pmac-utils, I am no
> longer maintainer of that package after it was taken over by Adam
> Conrad (with my express consent) in 2016. Adam carried out the
> package renam
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 08:40:10AM +1300, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> Improvements to the pmac-utils package are best fed back to Adam, I suppose.
Ahh, and now that I've caught up on the thread, I have more context. It
would have been removed from testing due to the FTBFS bug we didn't fix,
and t
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:25:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
> packages) for other architectures. Any possibility to setup such a test
> rebuild
> for some architectures by the porters? Afaics the results for the
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:33:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> I'd rather not drop s390x from the list of architectures this package
> is built for, but this RC bug has now been around for 6 months, and at
> some point I'll want to get rid of it.
Not fixing a bug isn't the way to get rid of it.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> AFAICT the latest patch proposed by upstream on February 9 [1] has
> been tested on mips only. My understanding is that upstream has been
> waiting for more test results since then. Can anyone please test this
> on other big-endian arc
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> With a recent upload, the default gcc version on s390x changed to gcc
> 4.8. However, on powerpc, ia64 and sparc, the default gcc version is
> still gcc 4.6. As this version will not be supported in Jessie, we are
> now giving an o
6 matches
Mail list logo
