Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-09-21 Thread Christian Seiler
On 09/21/2016 08:41 AM, Riku Voipio wrote: > AFAIK Address space randomizing is not really helpful on 32 bit > architectures - there is just not that many places to randomize to[1]. Well, sure, but there's still a huge difference in an explot with 100% reliability, or an exploit that will just

powerpcspe: why DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on buildds?

2016-06-19 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear ppcspe porters, As dietlibc has now been finally built for powerpcspe, I noticed from the build log [1] that DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck is set. I have taken great care to make sure a set of tests that covers many things is run when the package is built, to weed out architecture-specific

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-05 Thread Christian Seiler
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> ppc64: >> >> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We >> have over >> 11.000 packages installed > [...] >> sparc64: >> We are close to

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-04-12 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi again, I finally got it working. :) I could debootstrap powerpcspe in QEMU just right now. Integrating it into my pbuilder setup was a bit more tricky, because libkmod2 and libcryptsetup4 (dependencies of systemd, which is part of the base system) aren't available, but since those aren't

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-04-12 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2016-04-12 13:27, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On 04/12/2016 12:52 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: base-passwd isn't compiled on ppcspe I just built and uploaded the package manually. Please wait until wanna-build reports the package status as "Installed", then try again. Tha

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-04-12 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2016-04-12 12:07, schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: On 03/28/2016 07:40 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: As I mentioned earlier in this thread, you can't currently fully debootstrap powerpcspe, because of some packages that aren't compiled yet, for example apt Just a quick update

Re: [RFC] dietlibc port to ppc64el

2016-04-06 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 04/06/2016 11:45 PM, Breno Leitao wrote: > On 04/06/2016 04:57 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >>> Do you know this problem? Is it related to something like: >>> >>> https://github.com/ensc/dietlibc/blob/87a59f2e6dc11d9f5b82c9d6eff09aae2daa1bbb/ppc64/setjmp.S#L3-L

Re: [RFC] [v2] dietlibc port to ppc64el

2016-04-06 Thread Christian Seiler
variables (even indirectly via unified_syscall) Pushed it to the same branch as before: On 04/03/2016 09:36 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/dietlibc.git > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/dietlibc.git/log/?h=ports/ppc64el > >

Re: Re: [RFC] dietlibc port to ppc64el

2016-04-04 Thread Christian Seiler
[ please CC me, I'm not subscribed to the list, I only saw your reply by chance in the archives because I wanted to link this thread somewhere ] Breno Leitao wrote: > On 04/03/2016 06:54 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Well, you can just compile any number of standard programs (t

Re: [RFC] dietlibc port to ppc64el

2016-04-03 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, Thanks for your response! On 04/03/2016 10:53 PM, Breno Leitao wrote: > On 04/03/2016 04:36 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> May be built via gbp buildpackage. If needed, I can also provide a .dsc >> file if necessary. > > I tried to built it on my ppc64el machine usin

[RFC] dietlibc port to ppc64el

2016-04-03 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear PPC porters, I've started helping out with the dietlibc package. Since it does support powerpc (32) and ppc64, and ppc64el is a release architecture, I thought it might be a good thing to try and port it over from ppc64 to ppc64el. (Famous last words: "How difficult can that be?" ;-)) Well,

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-03-29 Thread Christian Seiler
On 03/29/2016 12:57 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Here's a minimal chroot that I created myself that should work with > qemu-user. It already contains gcc-5 and Perl 5.22: > >> https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/chroots/sid-powerpcspe-sbuild.tgz > > Use run a dist-upgrade to update the

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Seiler
On 03/28/2016 07:28 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >>> Unfortunately, that doesn't help me without a proper rootfs. :( >> >> Here's an image from the AmigaONE people which you can try: > > Uh… debootstrap? As I mentioned earlier in this

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-03-28 Thread Christian Seiler
Thanks for your quick response! On 03/28/2016 10:31 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 01:26:23AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >>> qemu-system-ppc -cpu e500v2 -M mpc8544ds -enable-kvm -m 2047 -bios >>> ./u-boot.e500 -nographic -kernel ./uI

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-03-27 Thread Christian Seiler
On 03/27/2016 11:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> [1] Of course, if you know how to properly set up a qemu-based chroot >> on amd64, that'd also be sufficient for me. But I did try to >> debootstrap with the http://antcom.de/powerpcspe/ repository >> according to

Re: Bug#819069: dietlibc: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing FPU emulation in library

2016-03-27 Thread Christian Seiler
[ replying off-bug but on-list, please CC me since I'm not subscribed ] On 03/23/2016 02:21 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > "__unorddf2" is a function in the FPU emulation library present in glibc. In > the past, the FPU emulation code was present in libgcc which is why dietlibc > used to