Re: Bug#155095: libmm11 1.1.3-7 broken on PowerPC

u, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:43:23AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > > Good idea. MMFILE is probably the safest, although I'm still puzzled as > > to why IPCSHM seems to be so flaky. > > > It proved one thing: that compiling against libmm12 didn't make a > &

Re: Bug#155095: libmm11 1.1.3-7 broken on PowerPC

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > Adding diagnostics to php4 so it'd actually say what went wrong (MM > provides mm_error() giving a text-form error) might be helpful. Here's the error returned by mm_error() when mm_create() fails: mm:core: failed to acquire shared memory segment

Re: Bug#155095: libmm11 1.1.3-7 broken on PowerPC

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > I'm going to rebuild forcing shm to MMFILE anyway since it'll avoid > problems with the shm method randomly changing depending on which buildd > it gets built on. Good idea. MMFILE is probably the safest, although I'm still puzzled as to why IPCSHM seems

Re: Bug#155095: libmm11 1.1.3-7 broken on PowerPC

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Mark Brown wrote: > Nothing. PHP keeps on randomly breaking, even with only rebuilds rather > than code changes for the shared library - the same thing happened > between -4 and -6 on alpha with no code changes involved. > > There's a potential issue with the choice of share

Re: Why gcc-2.95.4

On Fri, 31 May 2002, Tom Rini wrote: > IIRC, CVS version of gcc-2.95 is at .4, which may or may not ever be > released. But it has fixes over .3. This is mostly true. The 2.95 branch was never officially closed and code has been added since 2.95.3 was released, but it's doubtful that we'll see

Re: TiBook keyboard/X questions

On 3 May 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Others have reported the same problem, and IIRC all of them used the > fbdev driver - can somebody confirm or disprove that? I can disprove it, per se, but I can say that I use the fbdev driver on my 550 Tibook and haven't run into this problem

Re: Audio Problems on an iBook

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >To solve this, I'm hoping to finish the DRC and biquad filtering > >implementations that I started. I just haven't been able to figure out > >which canned filter settings are the best for this hardware yet (I'm NOT > >fond of the ones that App

Re: Audio Problems on an iBook

On 26 Apr 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > I don't really think too loud but that the volume changes rather quickly > near the maximum. I've gotten feedback in the past about the default mixer settings being unusually loud, which I also realised once I started working in a cubicle :-)

Re: Audio Problems on an iBook

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Drake Diedrich wrote: >I suspend many times per day, and this would happen about once per week > (the screaming iBook). Removing the audio module on suspend and bringing it > back in on wakeup removes the symptom - as long as you don't mind losing > your audio settings e

Re: Audio Problems on an iBook

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Well, I think the tas lose it's clock when the machine is asleep. > So all the volumes should be set to 0 before sleep, and the chip > should probably be fully reconfigured on wakeup. Ugh...that's what I was afraid of. Ok, I'll try to free up

Re: Audio Problems on an iBook

On 25 Apr 2002, David Stanaway wrote: > It happens on my TiBook which is a first generation one. It only happens > when I close the lid and keeps feeding back until I mute and unmute the > audio. > > I suspect it is something to do with the mixer settings getting junked > when the system goes in

Re: Audio Problems on an iBook

On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Will Aoki wrote: > It's been happening quite frequently as of late on my 1st generation > iBook2 - it tends to occur at least once a week (most recent was > Tuesday, in a library - gack!), although for me it's a rapid clicking > noise instead of static or a feedback whistle.

Re: Noise on resume [was Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz]

On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Will Aoki wrote: > It's finally happened again, but this time I had a tape recorder, > headphones, and time to experiment. I'll report my results for the > record: This is very odd...I've been through at least 180 suspend-resume cycles and still haven't encountered this (TiB

Re: avifile on PPC

On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, [iso-8859-1] Rogério Brito wrote: > Well, it seems that the avifile package on testing can be > compiled on powerpc (just tried it), but it is not currently > being built for some reason. Did avifile run ok? I haven't tried it yet, but am compiling it now.

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On 11 Mar 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Anyway, xmms-cdread needs to be fixed to always convert the data to > native byte order, if only for the EQ to work (not that we need the xmms > EQ :). BTW...I didn't realise before, but my EQ was enabled in xmms, which was what was producing t

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On 11 Mar 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Or check out the CVS tree at > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/alsa Will do :-) > You're right that it doesn't have any byte-swapping code, but it marks > the data as little endian, so apparently the OSS output plugin swaps the > bytes (no

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not sure it's worth hacking much in the horrible mess that is > the current dmasound_pmac. 2.5 is bringing the Alsa driver in which > has already been split, I'm wondering if we shouldn't go the same > way for what remains of 2.4 lifetime and spl

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What I have found is mostly cases where the dmasound code would > try to write awacs registers on i2s based machines, which means > the i2s registers could be garbaged. I'm fixing this in my tree > along with making sure i2s is properly configured fr

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On 11 Mar 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Investigation shows that the size of fragments written to /dev/dsp seems > to be critical, fragments smaller than about 4096 bytes cause the looping > hang frequently. Fortunately, there are good games like tuxracer where > this can be configure

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On 10 Mar 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Following up to myself, it does seem to be worse with higher quality > sound (meaning higher data volume) and more graphics intensive apps, so > bus saturation sounds plausible. Why did this never happen on the Pismo? > Was the sound chip on a d

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On 9 Mar 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > I doubt xmms-cdread is broken at all, it works here with the OSS output > plugin but not with crossfade (it doesn't matter if crossfade uses the > OSS plugin or its own OSS support). The xmms-cdread code also looks > sane, though a quick look at

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Will Aoki wrote: > Not seen the first two, but the next: > > > - some apps cause the driver to go into a weird state where all attempts > > to play sound fail, the only remedy is to unload and reload it > > is easily triggered by this: I'll check this out... > Another th

Re: Audio CDs in xmms on ibook2 2001 600Mhz

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Gordon Paynter wrote: > No, it's a "TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-R2002" -- a so-called combo drive. > (That's probably significant, but it completely slipped my mind at the > time. Oops.) Speaking of xmms and xmms-cdread, does anyone have a patch to swab the audio data? I haven't fou

Re: Annoying trackpad behaviour in the iBook 2

On 5 Mar 2002, Bastien Nocera wrote: > The trackpad utility in the powerpc-utils package can change this > behaviour. > > Has anybody tested the powermac-utils startup scripts ? Where are they? There doesn't seem to be a 'powermac-utils' package. If you're referring to powerpc-utils, though,

Re: gentle noise (was: (Offtopic) Humming on ibook2 audio port?)

On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Siggi Langauf wrote: > I usually don't boot that machine at all, but today I got the chance, and > I can verify that it produces the same noise in MacOS X. The patterns are > a bit different, but that's due to the different hd access > characteristics... Well, that's good ne

Re: gentle noise (was: (Offtopic) Humming on ibook2 audio port?)

On 11 Jan 2002, Bastien Nocera wrote: > I had the same problem. The "quickie fix hack" is to reload the > dmasound_pmac module. It seems the driver doesn't properly reinitialise > the hardware. I had mine yelling some strident noise during 3 minutes > before I figured it out and I missed a bi

Re: package hotkeys and libdb3...

Take a look at the patch in this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=127987&repeatmerged=yes It definitely fixes the segfault... C On 10 Jan 2002, Yves wrote: > > Hello, > > I've tried to use the hotkeys package on my sid to have the ibook2 > special keys wor

Re: package hotkeys and libdb3...

On 10 Jan 2002, Yves wrote: > I've tried to use the hotkeys package on my sid to have the ibook2 > special keys working. But the problem is strange, since hotkeys seg > fault. I've traced the problem, and it appears that it segfault when > calling "db_create" (conf.c line 246). I've tried to re

Re: gentle noise (was: (Offtopic) Humming on ibook2 audio port?)

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Siggi Langauf wrote: > After a night of sleep and some more listening, I found out that these > sonds occur when there is acces to the hard disk drive. > I'm using ext3, therefore the regular peaks. > When I do something like "find / -type f|xargs cat >/dev/null", I get a > c

Re: (Offtopic) Humming on ibook2 audio port?

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Nick Bailey wrote: > Don't know if this is relevant, but on my Dell laptop, all > sorts of ticks and groans come out of the speakers until the > ALSA driver gets loaded (it uses a Maestro3 chipset). I'm > guessing this is because at reset the internal audio out > lines a

Re: (Offtopic) Humming on ibook2 audio port?

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Siggi Langauf wrote: > Well, now that I've listened closely to my earphones while plugged to the > iBook, I've noticed a very high-pitched sound that occurs roughly every 2 > seconds and lasts for about half a second. Any guess what that could be? I'm still working on the tu

Re: Stable kernel tree

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Nicolas Lopez wrote: > It works great on mine(iBook 2001.0, aka 500Mhz) except it occationally > wakes up in a "bad mood" and starts making unplesant feedback noises. > reloading dmasound_pmac get it to behave again. This is on an older > kernel(2.4.15-presomething) though

Re: Stable kernel tree

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Derrik Pates wrote: > >From previous discussions, I can tell you that (at least the gen-1 TiBook, > dunno about the gen-2) the TiBook has a Burgundy audio chipset, not > Tumbler (what Apple calls Texas). The iBook2 is outfitted with the Tumbler > chip, on the other hand. :-)

Re: Stable kernel tree

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Leandro Noferini wrote: > can you help me to find a more stable kernel tree for powerpc? I am > using ben0 tree from cvs but it doesn't work fine for my iMac (it > cannot boot because it cannot "find" /dev/rtc) and on my iBook (sound > doesn't work yet). Which iBoo

Re: (ot) tibook screenshot..

On 17 Dec 2001, Laur Ivan wrote: > Could you please send me a screenshot made on a tibook (1152x768) > (lin-ppc and/or OsX)? Screenshot of what? A desktop, some apps, ??? C

Re: x, ppc and woody

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: > > This has been brought up on -x and -devel already. Brandon's fixes in > > -11 should be ok from what I can tell (I'll check tonight on my alpha and > > i386, which already have the -11 installed). Apparently, it was an > > assumption/oversight on

Re: packages wanted

On 11 Dec 2001, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Will that happen during the woody freeze? Because actually, I was lying > a bit: I'm running testing with stable and sid as alternatives to get > stuff from. There's no plans to diverge as of yet, but I expect the toolchain discussions to comme

Re: x, ppc and woody

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Matt Brubeck wrote: > I don't know the cause of this problem, but I can confirm that the same > thing happened to two of my friends with i386 boxes. It wrote out broken > XF86Config-4 files that used the 'vga' driver and generic screen settings. > > This is apparently a bug

Re: packages wanted

On 11 Dec 2001, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > That's not entirely true. I basically run woody but get stuff from sid > as needed or wanted. Remember, apt has super cow powers. :) But that's only true for now. Sid may not be too far from woody dependency-wise right now, but that will chang

Re: iBook2 touch pad mouse

On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, John Hughes wrote: > I may be speaking too soon.so forgive me, BUT, just invoking: > > trackpad notap > > Has caused the whole thing to behave very nicely. No more jitteryness and > jumping around. I am going to be truely happy if this actually cures my > iBook2's retc

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Well, some of them are. > > But it hadn't even occurred to me. I'll do that. Fantastic :-) Thanks. > > Interesting. This isn't the first time voltaire has had a dh_strip > > error which I couldn't duplicate. > > I can generally duplicate them

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Here's the log. > > > > > Here's an excerpt. > > | dh_strip > | dh_strip: command returned error code > | make: *** [binary-arch] Erro

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > The following seem to build fine on my machine and either had really > weird failures or no logs available from voltaire. So please requeue > them and I'll have something new to look at. > > kdestudio: dh_strip failed, perhaps this is intermittent?

Re: X on the new TiBooks

Oops...spoke too soon...that's what it should do :-P Looks like the X build is coming to a close, so I'll look at it in a bit. C On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > FYI, I'm looking at the pmud source now. It appears that, since it > doesn't

Re: X on the new TiBooks

Colin Walters wrote: > "Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Great. The backlight adjustment seems to work pretty well on mine > > (at least with 2.4.15-pre7-ben0), fyi. Oh, I don't know if I > > mentioned it to you, but closing the

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Colin Walters wrote: > You probably need to edit /etc/power/pwrctl. See the pwrctl_Core99 > function. Already tried. Nothing in there is even being called. It's not even doing a proper shutdown, it's just powering off immediately. For the record, I tried replacing the co

Re: 2.4.15 kernel

On 23 Nov 2001, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > No it's not, relax. :) > > That message always appears for undefined references. IIRC the linker > sets them to some magic value which doesn't fit into an R_PPC_REL24 > relocation. Ah, okwhew :-) > It's really a configuration error or ker

Re: 2.4.15 kernel

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Kevin van Haaren wrote: > Has anyone ben able to compile a pure 2.4.15 kernel? I'm getting the error: > > kernel/kernel.o: In function `show_task': > kernel/kernel.o(.text+0x17e0): undefined reference to `show_trace_task' > kernel/kernel.o(.text+0x17e0): relocation truncate

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I'm not sure I like CVS ;) > > It's actually a bitkeeper tree locally (just a child of ppc bk _devel), > and most changes get regulary pushed to those main PPC trees, so there > you get the history information in the long term. The fact that I

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I've found some radeonfb bugs causing all sort of colormap screwup using > the Xserver on fbdev mode (or MacOnLinux). I'm currently working on > fixing these, except a working version in my rsync tree real soon now > (possibly this evening). I

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 11:30:10AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > DefaultDepth depth > > specifies which color depth the server should use by default. > > The -depth command line option can be used to override this. If > > neit

Re: X on the new TiBooks

Ok, I've managed to get a semi-working Xserver module, but I still want to work on it some more. In the meantime, I've discovered that the only reason that my colourmap was screwed up under X using the framebuffer Xserver was because of the default fb depth (which is 8). When I did 'fbset -depth

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On 19 Nov 2001, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > There's a feedback link on the XFree86 site. > > Most if not all interesting docs are only available under NDA to XFree86 > members, I don't see the point of a links page to other docs which would > probably tend to be outdated. Better to use o

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On 19 Nov 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > On Mon, 2001-11-19 at 05:51, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > It did reach CVS, fyi, but their changelogs are not keyed by date, but > > rather by month, then by person and aren't guaranteed to be in > > chronological orde

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > X is known to have problems with radeon's on macs in general (I have to > slightly > hack it on my desktop AGP radeon card). Ani Joshi has patches for this > and most > of his work is supposed to have reached XFree CVS HEAD. Some other people a

Re: X on the new TiBooks

On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 12:27:03AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > The framebuffer device should display any mode passed to it by the X > > server. Do you have an 1152x768 mode definition in your XF86Config > > (there is no such mode built into the serv

Re: installation success using 3.0.16 on iBook Dual USB / HOWTO

On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > Incorrect how? I have mac-usb-us installed on my 400Mhz tibook without > problems. Dunno yet. On the 550, Return was mapped to a comma, etcI'll look into it this week. C

Re: New TiBook 550 w/Radeon Mobility question

On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >Hehehehe...what can I say? Actually, this was the first fully-assembled > >computer that I've purchased since the 1980s, so I'm probably not all that > >lucky :-P > > Well, as Michel said, I'm about to be a lucky bastard as well :) Mine will

Re: New TiBook 550 w/Radeon Mobility question

On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Not yet, you lucky bastard. ;) Hehehehe...what can I say? Actually, this was the first fully-assembled computer that I've purchased since the 1980s, so I'm probably not all that lucky :-P > Someone posted a patch to enhance things to the

Re: installation success using 3.0.16 on iBook Dual USB / HOWTO

keymap that is ideal on this beast. C On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > Branden's notes also apply to the new Titanium PowerBooks (at > least for the 550...I'm sure 667 is the same in general since most of the > hardware is unchanged between the two). So

Re: installation success using 3.0.16 on iBook Dual USB / HOWTO

Branden's notes also apply to the new Titanium PowerBooks (at least for the 550...I'm sure 667 is the same in general since most of the hardware is unchanged between the two). So, installing on a new TiBook should follow the same procedure. Nice work on the docs, Branden...very thorough :-) FYI

New TiBook 550 w/Radeon Mobility question

I know these things are brand new, but I was wondering if anyone else had a Radeon-equipped Powerbook yet? For anyone who's interested, here's my progress so far: * Installing wasn't easy. I used the r3 potato CD and worked around the "video=ofonly" situation...after that, it wasn't too hard

Re: Supported models

On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, sloopy malibu wrote: > i havnt heard anything on my offer on this... but i have been doing some > playing around with a Mac OS App similar to what i had proposed earlier > (recap: and application for a user to download and run to let them know > if their particular machine has

Re: Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Excellent! The long binutils compiles were triggering a bug in the Hurd, > causing a crash, so I had to remove it from the autobuilder. I will > add it back in now. Thanks for letting me know this. All the more reason to get cross-compiling situated a

Binutils no longer autobuilding the cross-compiling packages...

Just wanted to announce this... I'm removing the cross-compiler patches to debian/rules, etc. as of the upcoming 2.11.90.0.5-1. Until we get a better method for compiling these, I'd rather not have the packages available. As it stands, it takes several hours to build binutils and all of the cro

Re: Geoff's gmon_start fix to binutil works! (fwd)

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Matthias Klose wrote: > In gcc-2.95.2-13 I reverted the CVS updates from 2313 to 2220, > because the resulting libstdc++ wasn't binary compatible (apt-get core > dumped). Since then I didn't check again. Anyway, I upload a -17 which > fixes two missing files in the -1

Re: Geoff's gmon_start fix to binutil works! (fwd)

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Yes, absolutely. You might want to wait a tiny bit, though; Geoff said > that he was working on something about hidden/protected support. Yes, I caught that message as well. I figure we may as well try it, though, since it'll be a week or two bef

Geoff's gmon_start fix to binutil works! (fwd)

Am I correct in thinking that this is needed for woody? If so, let me know and I'll make a new binutils upload with it included... C -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 15:57:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Geoff's

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > The new gcc package build failed on Alpha during stage1 of the gpc > build. I can try eliminating gpc from the build for now (allowing me to > continue to get the new glibc stuff working), if that's an > option... This prob

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t

Re: Glibc, gcc, libdb2 and nss_db

On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote: > Well, here it comes. Glibc 2.1.94, hot of the glibc release process. I'm > currently building i386, powerpc and sparc, which I will upload throughout > the day and tonight as I build them. These are going into woody. Several > notes for the other ports (t

Re: i386->powerpc cross compiler

On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, David N. Welton wrote: > Has anyone actually managed to create a cross-compiler using the > Debian GCC (+ binutils) sources? Following the faq's instructions > does not work. There are a number of ommisions in the faq that limit > its utility, does anyone have a list of the

Re: compiling PPC kernels using binutils-2.9.5.0.22-5

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > It looks like objcopy no longer creates temporary files (the manpage states it > does), so it no longer works if the input and output file are the same. > > After reverting to binutils-2.9.5.0.22-4 everything worked fine again. Ok. I know I've w

Re: compiling PPC kernels using binutils-2.9.5.0.22-5

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > I'll figure this out. This whole security patch thing is overblown, IMO, > but I can see how it could pose a problem in a very specialised case. I'm > going to figure out why it's no longer doing temp files, since

Re: compiling PPC kernels using binutils-2.9.5.0.22-5

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Since binutils-2.9.5.0.22-5, the final stages in the kernel build process > fail: > > | objcopy vmlinux.elf vmlinux.elf --add-section=.note=note \ > | --add-section=sysmap=../../../System.map -R .comment > | objcopy: vmlinux.elf: File tru

New binutils uploaded to master

ainer: Christopher C. Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: binutils - The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities. binutils-dev - The GNU binary utilities (BFD development files) binutils-multiarch - Binary utilities that support multi-arch targets. Closes: 21918 27039 41999 44426

Re: console-apt

On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote: > Should i send you the compile.log for powerpc? Yes, please. Also, if you have time, run the testsuite from a vanilla compile like so: 1. unpack the source using dpkg-source 2. type "./configure" 3. type "make" 4. type "make check" 5. send me the .s

Re: console-apt

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Chris, any thoughts on a non-experimental upload of binutils in the > near future? Powerpc is somewhat broken at present. I just finished packaging 2.9.5.0.12. If you want to try it, you can obtain the source package via ftp from master in ~chris

Re: console-apt

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Chris, any thoughts on a non-experimental upload of binutils in the > near future? Powerpc is somewhat broken at present. It's coming soon (probably this weekend). I have to test the latest out with Alpha and ask Sparc to test it also (there have

Re: console-apt

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Christian Meder wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:39:27PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Chris, any thoughts on a non-experimental upload of binutils in the > > near future? Powerpc is somewhat broken at present. > > Chris wrote on the debian-alpha list that he's pre

Re: Uploaded postgresql 6.4.2-9 (source i386 all) to chiark

On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I have put together a preliminary release of 6.5 (beta2) and the source > for it can be obtained from http://www.lfix.co.uk/postgresql. Could you > please try to build that and send me any diffs you may need to make. The tarball on your site is fubar

Re: ldconfig obsoleted by ld.so package

On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Loic Prylli wrote: > I guess it is better to do it now, no package was depending on > ldconfig when I removed it on my system (just had to just > --force-remove-essential), this is logical as it was in base. > Anyway ldso actually "Provides:" ldconfig. That's good. I do rec

Re: ldconfig obsoleted by ld.so package

On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Loic Prylli wrote: > Looks like when you build ldso from source on Alpha (and probably on > powerpc), it now builds just the ldconfig binary, so exactly what was > provided by the ldconfig package. So I guess now the ldconfig package > can now be obsoleted (the ld.so package