Linux-tiny (Was: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.)

[..] > > I would say that if more of the linux-tiny patches were incorporated in > > the mainline kernel, then it would be a really nice addition. > > I'm not aware of "linux-tiny". Where can I learn more about it? http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/ > Enjoy! > > Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

Le mercredi 21 septembre 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > > On Aug 18 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I was forced to disable the floppy builds for now, since they failed to > > > build, and the 2.6.12 kernels are 200K too b

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 12:37 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 12:32:33PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Le mercredi 21 septembre 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:00:44AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > >

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:03:13PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > > Nope, they are available since a couple of weeks :) > > > Sorry, but there is only "cdrom", "hd-me

Re: powerpc d-i daily builds reactivated, use 2.6.12 kernels, including 64bit kernels, miboot floppies dropped for now.

Le jeudi 13 octobre 2005 à 13:14 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > Le lundi 10 octobre 2005 à 15:24 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit : > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > >

Install on OldWorld

So where are we? What about the miboot floppy images? Did we progress? I have several OldWorld waiting to be freed here. :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New miboot-enabled d-i daily builds set up

Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 18:16 +0200, Jerome Warnier a écrit : > Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 10:49 +0200, Hans Ekbrand a écrit : > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:35:51AM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > > > Le mercredi 03 mai 2006 à 01:11 +0100, Colin Watson a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've set up

Re: gcc install problems in sarge testing

s is a known bug in Sarge on all arch, and should be fixed now. See #268771 (there are lots of bugs which have been merged). [..] -- Jérôme Warnier Consultant BeezNest http://beeznest.net

Re: Suggestions for running Mac OS 9.0.1 on debian-x86-64

Christian Jaeger wrote: Hello What are you using for running Mac OS 9 (*) on a x86-64 machine? It seems there are only two ways: (a) running a ppc linux kernel with MOL under QEMU, run Mac OS inside MOL. (b) running SheepShaver Any good/bad experiences with either of those or other ways? (I

Re: Suggestions for running Mac OS 9.0.1 on debian-x86-64

Christian Jaeger wrote: Jérôme Warnier wrote: Just my .2c: Both applications also exist for Windows, and probably run nicely under WINE. Yes, I've thought about this, too, but I'd have to get a copy of those apps only for the purpose of the conversion; also I was still using F

Re: Suggestions for running Mac OS 9.0.1 on debian-x86-64

Christian Jaeger wrote: Jérôme Warnier wrote: In this case, why bother using MOL? Just install Mac OS 9 directly under your qemu VM. We're waiting for your confirmation that you have first-hand experience of running Mac OS 9 directly under qemu, or can refer to reports of doing