Re: please re-add "pgi" to buildd

2002-04-25 Thread James Troup
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks to Jimmy Kaplowitz, the "pgi" package should now be attempted > by the powerpc buildd (as of 0.9.6.3). Whoever's in charge of it, > please add it. (I'm not "in charge", but) done. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: Adding "ltrace" to buildd?

2002-04-18 Thread James Troup
Juan Cespedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "ltrace" has recently been ported to powerpc, but it doesn't get > compiled automatically by the buildd yet; Fixed. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Buildd Update

2002-01-08 Thread James Troup
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libwings-dev, libapt-pkg-dev, > > librpm0-dev, gettext, hermes1-dev [...] > I figured apt-get used the build-depends field, but clearly that's not true. Er

Re: Buildd Failures Update

2001-12-05 Thread James Troup
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:37:49PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Requeue Needed (builds fine for me) > > -- > > > scsitools - wish should be installed properly. > > netdude - no failure log for latest version. > > netcfg - no failure l

Re: Buildd Failures Update

2001-11-28 Thread James Troup
Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:29:42PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > > Doh. I was hoping that the autobuilder ran with DH_VERBOSE set to > > something so that problems with the tools that the dh scripts call would > > be logged (guess not,

Re: postgresql waiting for buildd

2001-08-25 Thread James Troup
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So who's going to build this? Dan has changed voltaire to start processing non-US so this should no longer be an issue. -- James

Re: Just curious

2001-08-02 Thread James Troup
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > suggests it built just fine a few days ago. > > Is something broken? A human is still required to sign the .changes file from the successful build log and I guess Dan is just busy at the moment. -- James

Re: request

1999-01-25 Thread James Troup
Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS. I am about to apply for a developer, would a scanned passport for ^ do? > authentication (according to the docs it probably does, I am just > doublechecking). Assuming you

Re: auto-build failure bug report (was Re: glib 1.1.12, gtk1.1.12 for debian/ppc)

1999-01-13 Thread James Troup
Ted Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > > > > > No, but already working packages can be recompiled at new versions > > > automatically. > > > > True. > > Is it possible for a failure of this auto-compile to automatically file > a bug-report against the package t

Re: i just compiled gtk1.1.5 and glib1.1.5 packages.

1998-12-14 Thread James Troup
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > how can i get an account on tervola ? Hartmut, Joey, or Dan can arrange one for you. -- James

Re: i just compiled gtk1.1.5 and glib1.1.5 packages.

1998-12-10 Thread James Troup
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The packaging was incidental. I just needed to figure out how the > heck to USE it. Where's a good place to look for documentation? CVS tree; wanna-build actually has documentation, unlike the others (though the packaging is remedying that). Oh,

Re: i just compiled gtk1.1.5 and glib1.1.5 packages.

1998-12-08 Thread James Troup
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think, same dbuild, but I meant wanna-build from James. >From Roman. James is the lamer who hasn't packaged it yet. Incidentally, why do you need a package [of wanna-build]? Hartmut's running a powerpc wanna-build database already on tervola, w

Re: i just compiled gtk1.1.5 and glib1.1.5 packages.

1998-12-07 Thread James Troup
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe we're talking about different dbuilds, but I could be > wrong... You were talking about wanna-build. Which I still haven't finished packaging. Yay me! Or something. -- James

Re: Fix buildd@powerpc.debian.org bounces!

1998-10-11 Thread James Troup
[ Why on earth is this on devel? It's not relevant here. ] Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It provides: [ Gratuitous advertisement for smail snipped ] > The same setup should be installed on kullervo. If not, I might get > over and remove exim there in order to install Smail, too

Someone please fix the MTA on tervola ASAP

1998-10-10 Thread James Troup
Hi, Will someone with connectivity and root on tervola please fix the damn MTA? [EMAIL PROTECTED] is getting *flooded* by bounce messages in a most unamusing fashion. | From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Oct 08 20:01:18 1998 | Received: from punt-21.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.6] | by cookie with smt

Re: kernel-headers-* for different archs (was Re: What's Debian's /usr/src policy)

1998-02-09 Thread James Troup
[ This Cc: line is ridiculous, nice one someone ] Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In order to upload kernel-image along with its sources, should I > create a dedicated kernel-source-sparc package or requests the diffs > to be merged into the Debian kernel-source? No, and no. > What

Re: [Debian Installer ] regex0g_0.12-5_powerpc.changes is NEW

1997-12-31 Thread James Troup
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > powerpc please remember to use the -M switch to dpkg-buildpackage(1) -m, sorry. -- James (doh)

[Debian Installer ] regex0g_0.12-5_powerpc.changes is NEW

1997-12-31 Thread James Troup
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: regex0g_0.12-5_powerpc.changes is NEW (new) regex0g-dev_0.12-5_powerpc.deb optional devel [...] (new) regex0g_0.12-5_powerpc.deb optional libs [...] (new) regex0g-dbg_