>After some thinking, you should even be able to just get the libc6 etc. debs
>from unstable and continue with testing otherwise.
I finally switched over to sid and now doing a dist-upgrade (finger crossed ;)
Ben.
Peter Meilstrup wrote:
>
> FWIW, I have my apt pointed at testing and woody, and I got libc
> 2.2-6 a couple weeks ago. Did you use apt-get dist-upgrade instead
> of upgrade? dist-upgrade does a better job of sorting through the
> dependencies.
glibc 2.2-6 should indeed be in testing now (just le
FWIW, I have my apt pointed at testing and woody, and I got libc
2.2-6 a couple weeks ago. Did you use apt-get dist-upgrade instead
of upgrade? dist-upgrade does a better job of sorting through the
dependencies.
--pm
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > Should I use woody instead ? "testing" has broken deps (debianutils wants
> > libc6 >2.1.97 while 2.1.3-13 is to be installed)
>
> woody _is_ testing ;)
>
> You may try unstable aka sid.
After some thinking, you should even be able
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> Should I use woody instead ? "testing" has broken deps (debianutils wants
> libc6 >2.1.97 while 2.1.3-13 is to be installed)
woody _is_ testing ;)
You may try unstable aka sid.
Michel
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software en
Should I use woody instead ? "testing" has broken deps (debianutils wants
libc6 >2.1.97 while 2.1.3-13 is to be installed)
Ben.
6 matches
Mail list logo