Re: "testing" broken on PPC ?

2001-01-04 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>After some thinking, you should even be able to just get the libc6 etc. debs >from unstable and continue with testing otherwise. I finally switched over to sid and now doing a dist-upgrade (finger crossed ;) Ben.

Re: "testing" broken on PPC ?

2001-01-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
Peter Meilstrup wrote: > > FWIW, I have my apt pointed at testing and woody, and I got libc > 2.2-6 a couple weeks ago. Did you use apt-get dist-upgrade instead > of upgrade? dist-upgrade does a better job of sorting through the > dependencies. glibc 2.2-6 should indeed be in testing now (just le

Re: "testing" broken on PPC ?

2001-01-03 Thread Peter Meilstrup
FWIW, I have my apt pointed at testing and woody, and I got libc 2.2-6 a couple weeks ago. Did you use apt-get dist-upgrade instead of upgrade? dist-upgrade does a better job of sorting through the dependencies. --pm On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: >

Re: "testing" broken on PPC ?

2001-01-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > Should I use woody instead ? "testing" has broken deps (debianutils wants > > libc6 >2.1.97 while 2.1.3-13 is to be installed) > > woody _is_ testing ;) > > You may try unstable aka sid. After some thinking, you should even be able

Re: "testing" broken on PPC ?

2001-01-03 Thread Michel Dänzer
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Should I use woody instead ? "testing" has broken deps (debianutils wants > libc6 >2.1.97 while 2.1.3-13 is to be installed) woody _is_ testing ;) You may try unstable aka sid. Michel -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software en

"testing" broken on PPC ?

2001-01-03 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Should I use woody instead ? "testing" has broken deps (debianutils wants libc6 >2.1.97 while 2.1.3-13 is to be installed) Ben.