Re: [S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk: Re: Bug#86356: analog: analog segfaults]

2001-02-23 Thread Michel Lanners
[cross-posted to linuxppc-dev] On 20 Feb, this message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] echoed through cyberspace: Background: analog segfaults when using a custom config file. The author tried debugging the program on my B50 and replied with this message. Is gcc known to be buggy for powerpc? I'm

Re: [S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk: Re: Bug#86356: analog: analog segfaults]

2001-02-23 Thread Kevin B . Hendricks
Hi, Most of the bugs in passing parameters have been fixed by the 2.95.3 series Franz Sirl has created. To see if it is indeed a parameter passing issue, I need to know what the types are for each parameter passed below (specifically if any are long long int or float or double types and what

Re: [S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk: Re: Bug#86356: analog: analog segfaults]

2001-02-23 Thread Jerry Van Baren
I'm not a gcc guru either, but what is the function prototype for printtree()? The rules for passing parameters vary by what kind of parameters are passed. Also, make SURE you have the CORRECT function prototype for printtree() in the function that calls it. A classic problem is not having

[S.R.E.Turner@statslab.cam.ac.uk: Re: Bug#86356: analog: analog segfaults]

2001-02-20 Thread md
Background: analog segfaults when using a custom config file. The author tried debugging the program on my B50 and replied with this message. Is gcc known to be buggy for powerpc? I'm running 2.95.2-17 and the program has been compiled without optimizations. - Forwarded message from Stephen