Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-29 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > If you get no output, you have no layout-id property. If you do get > > > > What are the plans for machines without layout-id, like the 5,2 model? > > Will there be any alsa/aoa support at some point? > > There will be, but let's get the ones with layout-id first since > snd-powermac should w

snd-powermac to replace esd+dmasound_pmac [was: Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids]

2006-05-27 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/27/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are the plans for machines without layout-id, like the 5,2 model? > Will there be any alsa/aoa support at some point? There will be, but let's get the ones with layout-id first since snd-powermac should work on the older ones.

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 19:02 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 5/25/06, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, > > Hi, > > > [1] to find your layout-id, execute the following: > > > > find /proc/device-tree/ -name layout-id | xargs hexdump -e '1/4 "0x%x\n"' > > > > If you get no output

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 5/25/06, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, Hi, [1] to find your layout-id, execute the following: find /proc/device-tree/ -name layout-id | xargs hexdump -e '1/4 "0x%x\n"' If you get no output, you have no layout-id property. If you do get What are the plans for machines

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:17 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I think we need to be careful about a couple other things: > > - We need non-pmf GPIO. Some layout-id based machines do need that, > like the mac mini Yeah, I saw that, but I need more insight into how that should work with a fe

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Once I have all these, I will, along with submitting snd-aoa [2], submit > a patch to snd-powermac that makes it refuse loading in presence of a > layout-id property as a first step to migrate to snd-aoa. > > At the same time, I'll probably make i2sbus refuse attaching to a device > unless ther

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 12:43 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Hey, > > In order to replace snd-powermac for the newer machines where the > 'sound' node has the 'layout-id' property, I'm looking for testers on > machines that have a layout-id [1] property with one of the following > values: 0x24, 0x29,

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 23:49 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > CC [M] /home/ken/snd-aoa/soundbus/core.o > > > In file included from /home/ken/snd-aoa/soundbus/soundbus.h:12, > > > from /home/ken/snd-aoa/soundbus/core.c:12: > > > include/sound/pcm.h:59: warning: ‘struct snd_pcm_subst

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-26 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 09:28 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:17 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > I think we need to be careful about a couple other things: > > > > - We need non-pmf GPIO. Some layout-id based machines do need that, > > like the mac mini > > Yeah,

[snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-25 Thread Johannes Berg
Hey, In order to replace snd-powermac for the newer machines where the 'sound' node has the 'layout-id' property, I'm looking for testers on machines that have a layout-id [1] property with one of the following values: 0x24, 0x29, 0x33, 0x50 and 0x3a. Once I have all these, I will, along with sub

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-25 Thread Andreas Schwab
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In order to replace snd-powermac for the newer machines where the > 'sound' node has the 'layout-id' property, I'm looking for testers on > machines that have a layout-id [1] property with one of the following > values: 0x24 That would be mine, but it h

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-25 Thread Johannes Berg
> > In order to replace snd-powermac for the newer machines where the > > 'sound' node has the 'layout-id' property, I'm looking for testers on > > machines that have a layout-id [1] property with one of the following > > values: 0x24 > > That would be mine, but it has the problem of the broken d

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-25 Thread Johannes Berg
Hey, > How about 0x3c and 0x3d (PowerMac9,1) ? I can't see anything in > snd-aoa-fabric-layout that matches 60 or 61. I last tried to play > with this a few weeks ago, but gave up with what I assumed were > config problems (undefined symbols) and had too many other things to > get on with. und

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-25 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 23:11 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > it seemed to build fine with this morning's git. There were some > messages during the build which might be important (I'm using > gcc-4.1.0) but I guess they are probably standard alsa things : > > CC [M] /home/ken/snd-aoa/soundbus/core

Re: [snd] looking for layout-ids

2006-05-25 Thread Paul Collins
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey, > > In order to replace snd-powermac for the newer machines where the > 'sound' node has the 'layout-id' property, I'm looking for testers on > machines that have a layout-id [1] property with one of the following > values: 0x24, 0x29, 0x33, 0x50 an