Buildd Failures

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:19:52AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > That's true, but help is always needed with processing the failed > build list: > > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/powerpc-failed.txt > > You don't need to be a developer to help; if you can figure out how to > fix a particular pac

Re: Buildd Failures

On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:47:32PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 12:19:52AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > That's true, but help is always needed with processing the failed > > build list: > > > > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/powerpc-failed.txt > > > > You don't

Re: Buildd Failures

I've run through more of the log and managed to get gimp 1.0.4-3.1, gimp-python 1.2-1, xmorph 1:20011010, and cfengine 1.6.3-7 to build from source, perhaps these need to be requeued. I'm using pbuilder with sid from Oct. 31, 2001. For those of you interested in the other bugs I filed. asis:

Re: Buildd Failures

I've run through more of the log and managed to get the following to build, so perhaps they need to be requeued. I'm using pbuilder with sid from Oct. 31, 2001. syslog-ng 1.5.9-2 scsitools 0.3-1 kweather2.99-3 fwbuilder 0.9.6-2 kicq2.0.0b3-20010313-1.3 konvers

Re: Buildd Failures

I've run through more of the log and managed to get the following to build, so perhaps they need to be requeued. I'm using pbuilder with sid from Nov. 5, 2001. emil2.1.0-beta9-10 mod-midgard 1.4.2-1-1 openjade1.4devel1-5 libxml-sablot-perl 0.70-2 For those with interest,

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:22:00AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I've run through more of the log and managed to get the following to > build, so perhaps they need to be requeued. I'm using pbuilder with sid > from Nov. 5, 2001. > > emil2.1.0-beta9-10 Missing build dep on 'ed'. You need

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:13:51PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:22:00AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I've run through more of the log and managed to get the following to > > build, so perhaps they need to be requeued. I'm using pbuilder with sid > > from Nov.

Re: Buildd Failures

> > > emil2.1.0-beta9-10 > > > > Missing build dep on 'ed'. You need to declare build deps on Priority: > > important packages. I think your chroot probably has it installed, I > > don't know how pbuilder works. Requeued. Of course, I could be wrong, > > since ed seemed to be installed. > >

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:13:51PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:22:00AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I've run through more of the log and managed to get the following to > > build, so perhaps they need to be requeued. I'm using pbuilder with sid > > from Nov.

Re: Buildd Failures

On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:15:37AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:13:51PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 11:22:00AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > I've run through more of the log and managed to get the following to > > > build, so p

Re: Buildd Failures

Since I was starting to confuse myself, I started annotating the failed log. It's at . Mostly I've added bug numbers and rebuild notes so it's easy for me to see what's done. Clearly I haven't worked through the whole list yet. I found the following probably n

Re: Buildd Failures

Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I found the following probably need to be requeued, since they built > fine for me using pbuilder and Nov. 12 sid. BTW is there a reason against just uploading the built packages instead of requeueing them? > I was wondering what the uncompiled bit the failed log mean

Re: Buildd Failures

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:05:41PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > I found the following probably need to be requeued, since they built > > fine for me using pbuilder and Nov. 12 sid. > > BTW is there a reason against just uploading the built packages instead > of req

Re: Buildd Failures

I managed to build the following with Nov. 12 sid using pbuilder, so I believe that they can be requeued. xmms-cdread 0.14a-2 pspp 0.3.0-6 kdebase-crypto 4:2.2.1-7 I filed the following bugs. tkchooser 119431 sphinx2 119433 ginac 119464 chess 119475 nec Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenk

Re: Buildd Failures

I was able to build the following packages on my box using Nov. 12 sid and pbuilder, so they should probably be requeued. xpvm 1.2.5-7 gfontview 0.3.2-2.1 rlinetd 0.5.6 wget-retriever 0.007 The following all seem to have libtool/automake problems on voltaire, but not on my box. I was wondering

Re: Buildd Failures

On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:16:44AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I was able to build the following packages on my box using Nov. 12 sid > and pbuilder, so they should probably be requeued. > > xpvm 1.2.5-7 > gfontview 0.3.2-2.1 > rlinetd 0.5.6 > wget-retriever 0.007 > > > The following all s

Re: Buildd Failures

On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:16:44AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I was able to build the following packages on my box using Nov. 12 sid > > and pbuilder, so they should probably be requeued. > > > > xpvm 1.2.5-7 > > gfontvi

Re: Buildd Failures

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:34:46AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:33:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:16:44AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > I was able to build the following packages on my box using Nov. 12 sid > > > and pbuil

Re: Buildd Failures

Working through the failed list I ran into gnome-print_0.32-3. It built on all the other buildds and on my box. The error seems odd for all that. | dh_installman -plibgnomeprint-bin gnome-font-install.1 | gnome-font-install.1: No such file or directory at | /usr/bin/dh_installman line 98. | make:

Re: Buildd Failures

> Working through the failed list I ran into gnome-print_0.32-3. It built > on all the other buildds and on my box. The error seems odd for all that. > > | dh_installman -plibgnomeprint-bin gnome-font-install.1 > | gnome-font-install.1: No such file or directory at > | /usr/bin/dh_installman line 9

Re: Buildd Failures

On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:12:32PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Working through the failed list I ran into gnome-print_0.32-3. It built > > on all the other buildds and on my box. The error seems odd for all that. > > > > | dh_installman -plibgnomeprint-bin gnome-font-install.1 > > | gnome-fon

Re: Buildd Failures

> > > Should we try requeueing it? > > > > Any hint on why gnome-font-install.1 wasn't generated? > > The pile of SGML errors right above that in the build log. First is: > nsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd/4.1/dbpool.mod:171:2:E: literal is > missing closing delimiter Figures. SGML - my favorit

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:05:20AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > Should we try requeueing it? > > > > > > Any hint on why gnome-font-install.1 wasn't generated? > > > > The pile of SGML errors right above that in the build log. First is: > > nsgmls:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dtd/4.1/dbpool.mo

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:45:06AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:05:20AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Did you set something up to coordinate load sharing WRT the logs? Is that > > even necessary these days? > > It doesn't seem to be. I need help with investiga

Re: Buildd Failures

I don't quite understand this one: scsitools build-depnds on tk8.2 which provides wish8.2. The alternatives then get set to point wish to wish8.2. At least, this is how it seems to work on my machine. Here's an excerpt from the failed build log on voltaire. | Build-Depends: tk8.2, debhelper |

Re: Buildd Failures

> > > Did you set something up to coordinate load sharing WRT the logs? Is that > > > even necessary these days? > > > > It doesn't seem to be. I need help with investigating and bug-filing > > on failure logs, which people like Steven have been doing a wonderful Great. I'm keeping myself busy wi

Re: Buildd Failures

> | Build-Depends: tk8.2, debhelper > | Warning: > | The following central src deps are (probably) missing: > | wish This is a warning only. wish is provided by tk8.2. > | Checking for already installed source dependencies... > | tk8.2: missing > | debhelper: already installed > | Che

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:20:47PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > | Build-Depends: tk8.2, debhelper > > | Warning: > > | The following central src deps are (probably) missing: > > | wish > > This is a warning only. wish is provided by tk8.2. > > > | Checking for already installed s

Re: Buildd Failures

On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 09:19:19PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > What you'd need is some way to add information to the build database, not > the logs (such as number of bug filed, so Dan can immediately see if a > particular package bug has been fixed by an upload so it makes sense to > try tha

Re: Buildd Failures

While working through the failure list I ran across the following which I believe should be requeued on voltaire. xdrawchem (build-depend on debmake fixed in andrea) rx320 (hasn't been tried in a while and works on my machine) netcfg (hasn't been tried in a while and works on my machine) I also

Re: Buildd Failures

Hi, Stephen El 25 Nov 2001 a las 04:32PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka escribio: > I also filed the following bugs. > > kannel 121134 This is not directly a kannel problem. Kannel needs threads support in openssl. Openssl package (and all its binary packages generated from them) have been uploaded b

Re: Buildd Failures

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:19:42AM +0100, Andres Seco Hernandez wrote: > Kannel needs threads support in openssl. Openssl package (and all its > binary packages generated from them) have been uploaded by its maintainer, > Christoph Martin, on Saturday 24 Nov. Latest openssl package (0.9.6b-4) > ha

Buildd Failures Update

Well I've finally made it all the way through the failure log. I've filed bugs as best I can. Here's what I can't account for. The following seem to build fine on my machine and either had really weird failures or no logs available from voltaire. So please requeue them and I'll have something new

Buildd Failures Update

While working through the failure logs Requeue Needed -- strace - builds with libc6-dev from current sid. kannel - builds with libssl-dev 0.9.6b-4 from current sid. evolution - new gtkhtml in current sid. As always my latest notes are at .

Buildd Failures Update

While working through the failure logs Requeue Needed -- gnustep-base_1.0.2-0.5 - builds with current sid. xawtv_3.66 - builds with current sid (at least for me). As always my latest notes are at . Thanks, Stephen -- Ste

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > The following seem to build fine on my machine and either had really > weird failures or no logs available from voltaire. So please requeue > them and I'll have something new to look at. > > kdestudio: dh_strip failed, perhaps this is intermittent?

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:13:16PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > kdestudio: dh_strip failed, perhaps this is intermittent? > > Before the log goes away, can someone either put it aside or send it to > me? I would like to see what, if a

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:29:42PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > Doh. I was hoping that the autobuilder ran with DH_VERBOSE set to > something so that problems with the tools that the dh scripts call would > be logged (guess not, though). Any idea why that isn't done? If it was > nev

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:39:22PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:29:42PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > > Doh. I was hoping that the autobuilder ran with DH_VERBOSE set to > > something so that problems with the tools that the dh scripts call would > > b

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Here's the log. > > > > > Here's an excerpt. > > | dh_strip > | dh_strip: command returned error code > | make: *** [binary-arch] Erro

Re: Buildd Failures Update

Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:29:42PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > > Doh. I was hoping that the autobuilder ran with DH_VERBOSE set to > > something so that problems with the tools that the dh scripts call would > > be logged (guess not,

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Well, some of them are. > > But it hadn't even occurred to me. I'll do that. Fantastic :-) Thanks. > > Interesting. This isn't the first time voltaire has had a dh_strip > > error which I couldn't duplicate. > > I can generally duplicate them

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:02:07PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Holy circular bugs batman! > > strace 117218 has now been assigned to kernel-patch-2.4.12-powerpc for a > fix which is supposed to be fixed around the 2.4.14 release > (kernel-headers and glibc). Of course this doesn't show up

Re: Buildd Failures Update

> Err, you've clearly not looked at (or had sent to your inbox) the > build logs for, err, let's see, xfree86, mozilla*, atlas, gsl, > gwydion-dylan or glibc. (Off the top of my head, there's probably > better and/or more examples) cint on some archs - will loop on some prompt until the disk fill

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:51:43PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 01:02:07PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Holy circular bugs batman! > > > > strace 117218 has now been assigned to kernel-patch-2.4.12-powerpc for a > > fix which is supposed to be fixed around the 2.4.14

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:16:38PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Err, you've clearly not looked at (or had sent to your inbox) the > > build logs for, err, let's see, xfree86, mozilla*, atlas, gsl, > > gwydion-dylan or glibc. (Off the top of my head, there's probably > > better and/or more exa

Re: Buildd Failures Update

While working through the failure logs Build Environment Issues strace - builds with 2.4.16 and current sid. kannel - builds with libssl-dev 0.9.6b-4 from current sid. Requeue Needed (builds fine for me) -- scsitools - wish should be installed properl

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:37:49PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Requeue Needed (builds fine for me) > -- > scsitools - wish should be installed properly. > netdude - no failure log for latest version. > netcfg - no failure log (old - 2001 Jun 18) When I asked about working on st

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 21:15, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:37:49PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Requeue Needed (builds fine for me) > > -- > > > scsitools - wish should be installed properly. > > netdude - no failure log for latest version. > > netcfg - no fa

Re: Buildd Failures Update

Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:37:49PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Requeue Needed (builds fine for me) > > -- > > > scsitools - wish should be installed properly. > > netdude - no failure log for latest version. > > netcfg - no failure l

Re: Buildd Failures Update

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:28:55PM +, James Troup wrote: > Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > When I asked about working on stuff I was told to just upload stuff if > > it built. What's the party line? > I can't/don't/won't speak for Dan, but in general, uploading stuff > because it