Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-13 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:31:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > Does the attached patch help with Option "UseFBDev"? > > > > Yes. :))) ... Thanks a lot, Mich

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-11 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:31 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > Does the attached patch help with Option "UseFBDev"? > > > > Yes. :))) ... Thanks a lot, Michel ...

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Does the attached patch help with Option "UseFBDev"? > > Yes. :))) ... Thanks a lot, Michel ... :) Excellent, thanks for testing. Ben, do you think this will al

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 00:54 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:57:52AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 11:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > (II) RADEON(0): [

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 00:54 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:57:52AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 11:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > (II) RADEON(0): [dri] Found DRI library version 1.2.0 and kernel module > > > version 1.25.0

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-10 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Ben, Michel: Seems things are becoming a bit more clear now ... :) On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:57:52AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 11:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: [ ... ] > > (II) RADEON(0): [dri] Found DRI library version 1.2.0 and kernel module > > versi

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 11:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 23:31 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:09:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:05 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > > > > [ 136.378439] [drm] Setting G

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 23:31 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:09:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:05 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > > [ 136.378439] [drm] Setting GART location based on old memory map > > > > This should only hap

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-07 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:09:43AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:05 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > [ 136.378439] [drm] Setting GART location based on old memory map > > This should only happen if the X driver thinks the radeon DRM is older > than 1.23. Please p

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-07 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:05 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > [ 136.378439] [drm] Setting GART location based on old memory map This should only happen if the X driver thinks the radeon DRM is older than 1.23. Please provide the full X log file that corresponds to this. -- Earthling Michel

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-06 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 22:35 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > For the crash at 'Jun 5 19:37' (above) I found a > /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old with the same time, on the machine where it > happened, and according to this it looks as if DRI is enabled for the > X-server, and at the same time unsupported:

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-05 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 08:05:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > I enable DRM in xorg.conf (that is 'Load "dri"'), rebooting ... > > > > Next time (after reboot) even the first try to start kdm failed: > > /var/log/kern.log: > > Jun 5 19:36:38 debby1-6 kernel: [ 122.156765] NFSD: start

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-05 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi Michel Short version first: The modules built fine, IINM. But X still crashes most of the instances where I try starting KDM with dri loaded via xorg.conf On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:33:04PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 18:19 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > >

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 18:19 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > CC [M] > /home/shorty/kernel-factory/git/modules/drm/drm/linux-core/savage_bci. > o > /home/shorty/kernel-factory/git/modules/drm/drm/linux-core/savage_bci.c: In > func > tion 'savage_driver_firstopen': > /home/shorty/kernel-fact

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-05 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 01:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > Does any of the following make a difference? > > > > > > * Commenting out Option "AGPMode

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-05 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Michel Thanks a lot for responding. Sorry if again I was bothering on a week-end .. On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 17:33 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-05

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 17:33 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 01:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > BTW: Is it possible to ssh i

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:33:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 01:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > BTW: Is it possible to ssh

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:33:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > But first this: I learned SSH the last days (I really didn't know > anything about it before, except that it *somehow* might provide a way > to access one computer with another one), > that's why I'm a bit late to Should ha

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-06-04 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:32:32AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 01:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > Does any of the following make a difference? > > > > > > * Commenting out Option "AGPMode

Re: Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-05-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 01:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Does any of the following make a difference? > > > > * Commenting out Option "AGPMode", "EnablePageFlip" or > > "BackingStore". > > * Not loading

Re: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-05-29 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:53:39AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > reassign 369167 xserver-xorg-video-ati > severity 369167 important > kthxbye > > On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 16:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:12:06PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > On Sat, 2006-0

Re: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-05-29 Thread Michel Dänzer
reassign 369167 xserver-xorg-video-ati severity 369167 important kthxbye On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 16:57 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:12:06PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 01:38 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > > On an updated unstab

Re: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-05-28 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Michel Thanks a lot for answering. On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:12:06PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 01:38 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > On an updated unstable Debian, PB5,8, X only starts now with > > Load"dri" > > disabled in xorg.conf. What's the Debian pa

Re: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-05-28 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 01:38 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On an updated unstable Debian, PB5,8, X only starts now with > Load"dri" > disabled in xorg.conf. What's the Debian package that is responsible > for the broken (?) dri driver: libgl1-mesa-dri? I've Version 6.4.1-0.4 > installed

DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

2006-05-26 Thread Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Hi On an updated unstable Debian, PB5,8, X only starts now with Load"dri" disabled in xorg.conf. What's the Debian package that is responsible for the broken (?) dri driver: libgl1-mesa-dri? I've Version 6.4.1-0.4 installed. If I don't disable dri on that machine it can damage the system: A