There's no fan in the ibook.
+++
Kevin Houlihan
http://randomhuman.tk
+++
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 21:41:05 +0200, Luca Bigliardi - shammash wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:06 PM, Harri J?rvi wrote:
> > How can I find out if there is a fan and what chip is used for
> > controlling it?
>
> "cat /proc/device-tree/uni-n/i2c/fan/device_type" on my ibook 2.2
> returns "ad
Hi,
I was very excited as I noticed there was a thermostat and fan driver
for iBook2 since my ibook has been suffering from high temperatures.
I haven't ever heard the fan start using GNU/Linux.
I tried the therm_adm103x.c module but it return ENODEV at
np = of_find_node_by_name (NULL
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 04:54:07PM +0100, Cedric Pradalier wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
> the patch is available at
> http://cedric.pradalier.free.fr/ibook2/index.html
[...]
> please report any feedback.
I applied the patch to mainline 2.6.5 on my ibook and it's working
since.
the usual cat /proc/cpuin
Hi all,
the patch is available at
http://cedric.pradalier.free.fr/ibook2/index.html
By default, it does not change anything to the chip status and only
provide an access to the adm103x chip. So it can be used just to see
what are the default values on your system.
please report any feedback.
On
> > Here's a third patch, which factorizes things a bit more and isn't
> > reversed as the second one was.
>
> Note that I'd like to have the driver split to a separate file
Ok, i'll do that.
--
Colin
This message represents the official view of the voices
in my head.
> Here's a third patch, which factorizes things a bit more and isn't
> reversed as the second one was.
Note that I'd like to have the driver split to a separate file
Ben.
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 00:04, Colin Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >First it sets a very high load on the CPU. I wonder if the task is
> >correctly scheduled. I'll have a look at that. It's as if the task
> >monitoring task was running without yielding the processor...
>
> No, it just seems to :) You have
Hi
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:03:12AM +0100, Michael Flaig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is you patch ibook specific, or could it also work with the tibook?
> I have an tibook 1Ghz, where can i read what sensor chip is integrated?
Look for a directory called "fan" in /proc/device-tree/
Alex
Hi,
is you patch ibook specific, or could it also work with the tibook?
I have an tibook 1Ghz, where can i read what sensor chip is integrated?
I think you could email benjamin herrenschmidt your patch, to have it
integrated in his kernel tree.
kind regards,
mfl
--
Michael Flaig (PROLinux) <[
Ok,
I've done my adm103x module. Thanks a lot to Colin and Frank. Without
them it would have been much longer. I first tried to integrate the
driver in the adt7c module, according to Colin's patches. But I
believe the two chips behaviour does not fit well in a common module.
On the
>>No, it just seems to :) You have a 1.0 load average, that's it ? this
>>is due to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, which is needed according to Benjamin;
>>however this doesn't eat the cpu power :)
>Hmmm. Isn't it a problem in load accounting ?
Dunno :-(
>I'll try this.
Here's a third patch, which facto
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:04:31 +0100,
Colin Leroy gracefully wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>First it sets a very high load on the CPU. I wonder if the task is
>>correctly scheduled. I'll have a look at that. It's as if the task
>>monitoring task was running without yielding the processor...
>
>No, it just seems to
> Interesting, maybe you can strip the bits about changing default limits
on
> ADM*. I put these because on ADT*, the limits are quite high by default.
Can you try this patch ?
Thanks,
--
Colin
adm_support.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi,
>First it sets a very high load on the CPU. I wonder if the task is
>correctly scheduled. I'll have a look at that. It's as if the task
>monitoring task was running without yielding the processor...
No, it just seems to :) You have a 1.0 load average, that's it ? this is
due to TASK_UNINTERRU
Hi,
I just tried your patch. It seems to work, at least for acces to the
chip, even with a joint driver. Some side effects :
First it sets a very high load on the CPU. I wonder if the task is
correctly scheduled. I'll have a look at that. It's as if the task
monitoring task was r
> >You are welcome to consolidate these into a single driver allowing
> >userland access to those values & finer thermal control :) A bit
> >like Colin Leroy did for the recent models ...
> >
>
> I'll try to make some steps in this direction ASAP.
> Thanks for the informations.
PS: It may be much
> >You are welcome to consolidate these into a single driver allowing
> >userland access to those values & finer thermal control :) A bit
> >like Colin Leroy did for the recent models ...
>
> I'll try to make some steps in this direction ASAP.
> Thanks for the informations.
For kernel 2.6, you ca
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:09:02 +1100,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt gracefully wrote:
>
>> .../...
>
>You are welcome to consolidate these into a single driver allowing
>userland access to those values & finer thermal control :) A bit
>like Colin Leroy did for the recent models ...
>
I'll try to make some
> .../...
You are welcome to consolidate these into a single driver allowing
userland access to those values & finer thermal control :) A bit
like Colin Leroy did for the recent models ...
> I also have the feeling that my iBook operates at higher temperature
> if I using linux (esp. 2.6.4-vanil
Cedric Pradalier wrote:
> Hi,
> I've noticed that the fan is started according to a much higher
> temperature when using linux (2.6.3-ben2) w.r.t mac os x. (for instance
> if I reboot on macosx after compiling my kernel, fan is started
> immediately)
>
> Does somebody have a hints of w
Hi,
I've noticed that the fan is started according to a much higher
temperature when using linux (2.6.3-ben2) w.r.t mac os x. (for instance
if I reboot on macosx after compiling my kernel, fan is started
immediately)
Does somebody have a hints of what rules this ? Is there a parame
22 matches
Mail list logo
