Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2003-01-17 Thread brett-debianppc
Hmm, ok I after checking my kernel source, I guess I bungled the patch somehow, I must have rsync'd after patching or something. Got it working now, thanks! -Brett On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:02:00PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Mit, 2003-01-15 at 22:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I applied

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2003-01-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2003-01-15 at 22:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I applied this patch and checked off CONFIG_LOWLAT and CONFIG_LOWLAT_SYSCTL, I hope you mean those minus the 'W', even though you insist on writing it? ;) > but I don't see a /proc/sys/kernel/lowlatency as mentioned here: > http://www.zip.c

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2003-01-15 Thread brett
I applied this patch and checked off CONFIG_LOWLAT and CONFIG_LOWLAT_SYSCTL, but I don't see a /proc/sys/kernel/lowlatency as mentioned here: http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/schedlat.html#downloads I'm running 2.4.20-benh1, do I need to make this or something? Is there any other way to determine

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2003-01-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2003-01-09 at 02:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:08:17PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > > I've been using the low latency patch for quite a long time with good > > results and no problems, the caveat is that it doesn't patch > > arch/ppc/config.in yet so it's not

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2003-01-08 Thread brett
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:08:17PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > I've been using the low latency patch for quite a long time with good > results and no problems, the caveat is that it doesn't patch > arch/ppc/config.in yet so it's not actually used unless you add > CONFIG_LOLAT there. Ok, as long

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2002-11-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 19:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anybody know if the low latency and preemptible patches work with a > benh rsync'd kernel? Specifically, I was thinking of giving the > kernel-patch-ck package a whirl which includes: > * 0(1) and batch scheduler > * Preemptible ker

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2002-11-04 Thread andrew lattis
Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:39:26 -0500 To: debian-powerpc the pre-empt patch's at http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/ only support i386, arm, and something else i can't remember...powerpc isn't on the list though :( - End forwarded message

Re: Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2002-11-04 Thread andrew lattis
the pre-empt patch's at http://www.tech9.net/rml/linux/ only support i386, arm, and something else i can't remember...powerpc isn't on the list though :( On 2002/11/04 10:29:21AM -0800, Mon, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anybody know if the low latency and preemptible patches work with a > ben

Low-latency/Preemptible/Compressed Cache

2002-11-04 Thread brett
Does anybody know if the low latency and preemptible patches work with a benh rsync'd kernel? Specifically, I was thinking of giving the kernel-patch-ck package a whirl which includes: * 0(1) and batch scheduler * Preemptible kernel * Low-latency * Compressed cache * Andrea Arcangeli's V