On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 10:51, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:37:02PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Upstream libc has perfectly working NPTL for ppc and had so for a while
> > now, though debian didn't catch up yet unfortunately for various reasons
> > (that I consider no
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:37:02PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Upstream libc has perfectly working NPTL for ppc and had so for a while
> now, though debian didn't catch up yet unfortunately for various reasons
> (that I consider no-brainer personally, but I gave up trying to argue).
I u
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:46:25PM +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> (ppc). kernel is (self compiled) 2.6.7-rc2 with latest pmdisk patches
> (but the suspend to disk don't really work).
Just complaining won't help. Giving some details on the errors that show
up probably does.
-- Guido
signatu
> What is NPTL status w.r.t libc? I did google, but did not found really
> clear results (it seems that libc 2.3.2 has NPTL, but I am not
> sure)?
Upstream libc has perfectly working NPTL for ppc and had so for a while
now, though debian didn't catch up yet unfortunately for various reasons
(
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 22:46 +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> I don't have any man pages (in english) for pthread_kill, which is
> briefly mentionned in libc-doc. Bizarrely, manpges-fr from
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/doc/manpages-fr seems to contain a
> french translation of such a ma
Dear All,
I am using Debian/Sid on a new Apple PowerBook 12" 1.33GHz
(ppc). kernel is (self compiled) 2.6.7-rc2 with latest pmdisk patches
(but the suspend to disk don't really work).
It is my impression that the current libc & libc-dev 2.3.2.ds1-13 are
using the new NPTL (Native POSIX Threading
6 matches
Mail list logo
