Hi,
When the roll call for port maintainers came up a few months down, I
put my name down as a part-time powerpc person. However, I've had
to recuse myself for various reasons--I won't be able to commit to
doing any powerpc porting or port-related work for jessie. If
anyone else can commit
Besides the open license issue, are there any objections from port maintainers
to make GCC-4.4 the default?
As a first step that would be a change of the default for C, C++, ObjC, ObjC++
and Fortran.
I'm not sure about Java, which show some regressions compared to 4.3. Otoh it's
not amymore
* Wartan Hachaturow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-19 22:17:15 CEST]:
Checking the arch requalification wiki page, I've noticed that powerpc
port is at risk, partly because of just 2 maintainers mentioned.
Is that true, and if it is, who are those two brave guys? ;)
There is a link to the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a link to the information page at the top.
Ah, I see.
Well, filling the informations in the linked page surely helps. It is
though a bit hard to gather these informations - the requalification
page from last
On Jul 20 2008, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, filling the informations in the linked page surely helps. It is
though a bit hard to gather these informations - the requalification
page from last year didn't contain
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:28AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc
issues.
While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc
issues.
While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time
permits, I can't take any kind of leading
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc
issues.
While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time
permits, I can't take any kind of leading role at this time, and I'd
prefer the people who are
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:28AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc
issues.
While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time
permits, I can't take any
into adding
myself under the impression that it was about DDs, not about port
maintainers. I don't feel I got the required insight into the
architecture to be called that, sorry.
So long, and sorry.
Rhonda
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
be added as port
maintainer.
In the Etch page it was called Developers and I got lured into adding
myself under the impression that it was about DDs, not about port
maintainers. I don't feel I got the required insight into the
architecture to be called that, sorry.
A port maintainer should
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:04 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc
issues.
While I do work on powerpc issues as I encounter them and as time
permits, I can't take any kind of leading role at this time, and I'd
prefer the
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If all you do is make sure the right people are aware of the problem
so there is a high chance in getting things fixed, you would qualify
as port maintainer IMHO...
I agree on that and can help with the need uploads and like, if needed.
--
O T A V
Hi
Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on powerpc issues.
Feel free to complete the page for the other criteria as well...
Cheers
Luk
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/powerpcLennyReleaseRecertification
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
14 matches
Mail list logo
