Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-10 Thread Olaf Hering
begin On Tue, Jul 09, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: But it seems zImage.initrd.prep is broken since at least 2.4.16: Well, with 2.4.19-rc1 (from linuxppc_2_4, common_config + the initrd from

Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-10 Thread Steve Gore
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:57:17PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: begin On Wed, Jul 10, Olaf Hering wrote: begin On Tue, Jul 09, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: But it seems zImage.initrd.prep is broken since at least 2.4.16:

Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-09 Thread Olaf Hering
begin On Wed, Jul 03, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote: Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported still. Thanks. ocan you provide a new patch for _devel? I used that one and it

Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: begin On Wed, Jul 03, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote: Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported still.

Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: But it seems zImage.initrd.prep is broken since at least 2.4.16: Well, with 2.4.19-rc1 (from linuxppc_2_4, common_config + the initrd from http://penguinppc.org/~olaf/2.4.16/ramdisk.install.gz): Bytes Received =2325367, Bytes Loaded

Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:58:17PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote: Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported still. Thanks. ocan you provide a new patch for _devel? I

Re: Patch for IBM PRePs

2002-07-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 09:02:32PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Jul 01, Tom Rini wrote: Lemme know if you still have the correct ammount of memory reported still. Thanks. ocan you provide a new patch for _devel? I used that one and it doesnt compile D'oh. I forgot to add