Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-17 Thread Gregorio Gervasio Jr.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:40:06 +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [ TiPB screen artifacts when sleeping with 2.4.6 kernel ] b It's a side effect of my tentative to save more power by shutting b down the DAC and LVDS transmittr. I'm trying to trace the MacOS b driver to figure

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-16 Thread Gregorio Gervasio Jr.
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:52:46 -0400, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [ TiPB sleep on 2.4.6 kernel ] c Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could one of you quickly test if the problem still happen with my current rsync ? I merged some fixes from recent bk _2_4_devel that

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Colin Walters
Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Disabling altivec seemed to fix the problem sleeping. It went to sleep and woke up 7 or 8 times with no problems aside from temporarily scrambling the console a bit. Yep, disabling altivec worked for me too.

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Gregorio Gervasio Jr.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:37:41 -0500, Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [ TiPB sleep problem with 2.4.6 ] a cpu 0: vector: 300 at pc = c0007894, lr = c0007894, msr = b032, sp = c76d9d90 [c76d9ce0] a dar = 358, dsisr = 4000 a current = c76d8000, pid = 283, comm = pmud a 0:mon (c007894 is in

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Gregorio Gervasio Jr.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:30:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregorio Gervasio Jr.) said: [ TiPB sleep problems with 2.4.6 ] g I get the same trace. As Olaf Hering suggested, it's failing g when giveup_altivec is called. It looks like a processor version g check was recently added to

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
giveup_altivec: mfpvr r24 /* check if we are on a G4 */ srwir24,r24,16 cmpwi r24,[EMAIL PROTECTED] beq 3f /* continue */ mflrr24 bl msr_vec_debug /* debug thingy in process.c */

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
failing again (as it does even with older kernels). X11 sleep still works. It seems like the problem is in aty128_sleep_notifier because this debug code you suggested: - edit drivers/video/aty128fb.c, comment out the call to pmu_register_sleep_notifier() line 1907, and add a return; at

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Disabling altivec seemed to fix the problem sleeping. It went to sleep and woke up 7 or 8 times with no problems aside from temporarily scrambling the console a bit. Yep, disabling altivec worked for me too. Could one of you quickly test if the problem still happen with my current rsync ? I

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Colin Walters
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could one of you quickly test if the problem still happen with my current rsync ? I merged some fixes from recent bk _2_4_devel that may or may not help. Yep, rsync as of about 20 minutes ago, with Altivec support enabled, sleeps just fine for

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-11 Thread Christoph Ewering
Hello Benjamin! Same for me, rsynced, recompiled and did a quick test. sleep works within X and console! Thanks for your work, Christoph Colin Walters schrieb: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could one of you quickly test if the problem still happen with my

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Could you resync again ? Sleep is supposed to work with my current kernels on the TiBook, if it's still locking up your box, some investigations will be needed. rsync as of about 33 minutes ago doesn't work for me. Note that if you are using

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AFAIK this is related to thermal management. Apparently you should leave it off for now. It doesn't harm my Pismo though. I don't have thermal management enabled. FWIW, here's the .config: # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # #

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-10 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:11:59AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: I have my Microsoft USB optical mouse plugged in, and I do have the well no wonder, you attach something made by Microsoft and you expect stability? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ pgpa7KSPuZbgq.pgp

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-10 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
I have my Microsoft USB optical mouse plugged in, and I do have the Airport card installed now, but I don't have the Airport driver module running. Did you try without the USB mouse ? And also without compiling the USB OHCI driver in the kernel at all ? If I understand you properly, it hangs

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-10 Thread Adam Lazur
Benjamin Herrenschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Did you try without the USB mouse ? And also without compiling the USB OHCI driver in the kernel at all ? Hmm, I have usb-ohci in my kernel... I have the same symptoms on my TiPB as the others reported, so I figured I'd help debug. One thing we

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-10 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Jul 10, Adam Lazur wrote: return notifier c0280d8c cpu 0: vector: 300 at pc = c0007894, lr = c0007894, msr = b032, sp = c76d9d90 [c76d9ce0] dar = 358, dsisr = 4000 current = c76d8000, pid = 283, comm = pmud 0:mon can you try to disable altivec in your kernel? c0007820 T

benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Colin Walters
Is anyone else out there using a recentish benh 2.4.6 kernel with a TiBook? 2.4.4 from a while ago worked fine for me for pretty much everything, but 2.4.6 kills the machine when I close the lid. I would just stick with 2.4.4, except that it locks the machine when I try to build the Debian boot

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Is anyone else out there using a recentish benh 2.4.6 kernel with a TiBook? 2.4.4 from a while ago worked fine for me for pretty much everything, but 2.4.6 kills the machine when I close the lid. I would just stick with 2.4.4, except that it locks the machine when I try to build the Debian boot

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Colin Walters wrote: Is anyone else out there using a recentish benh 2.4.6 kernel with a TiBook? 2.4.4 from a while ago worked fine for me for pretty much everything, but 2.4.6 kills the machine when I close the lid. AFAIK this is related to thermal management. Apparently you should leave

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Michel Dänzer
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Note that if you are using DRI in X, you should also make sure you enable APM emulation (a new option in my kernels), and that you create /dev/apm_bios mknod /dev/apm_bios c 10 134 This is Debian, so just cd /dev; MAKEDEV apm :) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread David N. Welton
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, does sleep work with older kernels ? (you have the proper hacks to pmud scripts for sleep to work properly on core99) ? Apropos... are we including the latest/best/brightest of these scripts in Debian? -- David N. Welton Free Software:

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Michael Schmitz
Also, does sleep work with older kernels ? (you have the proper hacks to pmud scripts for sleep to work properly on core99) ? Apropos... are we including the latest/best/brightest of these scripts in Debian? If someone tells me which version of the pmud pwrctl scripts is the best/brightest

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
AFAIK the airport unload hack is no longer required with 2.4 kernels (what's with 2.2.19?). If Ben says 2.4 sleep support on Core99 is stable, I'll just have to check the kernel version number and either shutdown or sleep. If someone backports the Core99 sleep code to 2.2, the better. 2.2.19

Re: benh 2.4.6 kernel

2001-07-09 Thread Michael Schmitz
AFAIK the airport unload hack is no longer required with 2.4 kernels (what's with 2.2.19?). If Ben says 2.4 sleep support on Core99 is stable, I'll just have to check the kernel version number and either shutdown or sleep. If someone backports the Core99 sleep code to 2.2, the better.