Στις 13-02-2017, ημέρα Δευ, και ώρα 21:00 +0100, ο/η John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz έγραψε:
> I don't know whether you have already dealt with the internals of
> compilers in the past, but I can tell you that it isn't a matter of
> just "fixing" it. For it to work, someone actually has to maintain
> the
On 02/13/2017 08:26 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>> Yes. Everyone who is basing their work on Firefox will have to move
>> to a different
>> codebase from version 53 on or fork Firefox and continue without
>> Rust.
>
> Or, fix Rust for powerpc?
I don't know whether you have already dealt wi
Στις 13-02-2017, ημέρα Δευ, και ώρα 20:20 +0100, ο/η John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz έγραψε:
> Yes. Everyone who is basing their work on Firefox will have to move
> to a different
> codebase from version 53 on or fork Firefox and continue without
> Rust.
Or, fix Rust for powerpc?
My 2c.
Konstantinos
On 02/13/2017 01:25 PM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> This does not surprise me. It is a really sad case. Even the developer of the
> TenFourFox port of FF knows that he will have to cease being code compatible.
Yes. Everyone who is basing their work on Firefox will have to move to a
different
AM, luigi burdo
wrote:
> It means all are killing us in all fronts.
>
> [image: ☹]
>
>
> Luigi
>
>
> --
> *Da:* John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> *Inviato:* lunedì 13 febbraio 2017 11.49
> *A:* debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
> *Ogget
It means all are killing us in all fronts.
[☹]
Luigi
Da: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Inviato: lunedì 13 febbraio 2017 11.49
A: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Oggetto: Re: Firefox 51.0.1-1 on Debian Sid/experimental PowerPC (PPC32):
Segmentation fault
Hi!
On
Hi!
On 02/06/2017 10:39 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> I installed Firefox 51.0.1-1 with 'apt-get install -t experimental firefox'
> on Debian Sid/experimental PowerPC (PPC32) today.
Just as a warning in advance: Mozilla upstream has decided to make the Rust
programming langua
Running debug now with the symbols.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Christian Zigotzky
> wrote:
>
> Hi Herminio,
>
> If you want to backtrace Firefox, then you need the debug version of Firefox.
> Please add the following repositories to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> d
Will do. Anything to help.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Christian Zigotzky
> wrote:
>
> Hi Herminio,
>
> If you want to backtrace Firefox, then you need the debug version of Firefox.
> Please add the following repositories to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb http:/
Hi Herminio,
If you want to backtrace Firefox, then you need the debug version of
Firefox. Please add the following repositories to your
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ unstable-debug main
deb http://debug.mirrors.debian.org/debian-debug/ experimental-
You are right. I will install them and run again.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 2:18 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
>> On 02/12/2017 08:37 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
>> I ran firefox 51 on my iBook G4 running Sid. I was able to get a backtrace.
>> I am posting i
the strange it is working without issue if i dont count the strange webm
0x0x24 resolution in video (no video) on fedora and ubuntu mate 16.10.
and on mate i was using the debian sid build.
luigi
Inviato da iPad
> Il giorno 12 feb 2017, alle ore 10:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> ha s
On 02/12/2017 08:37 AM, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> I ran firefox 51 on my iBook G4 running Sid. I was able to get a backtrace. I
> am posting it here.
This backtrace is not usable, it doesn't contains any symbols:
Thread 1 "firefox.real" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x1ae2d
Thank you! :-)
-- Christian
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Feb 2017, at 08:37, Herminio Hernandez, Jr.
> wrote:
>
> I ran firefox 51 on my iBook G4 running Sid. I was able to get a backtrace. I
> am posting it here.
>
> Herminio
>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Christian Zigotzky
>> wr
I ran firefox 51 on my iBook G4 running Sid. I was able to get a backtrace.
I am posting it here.
Herminio
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:49 AM, Christian Zigotzky
wrote:
> Could someone also test Firefox 51.0.1-1? My gdb closes after the command
> 'run'.
>
> -- Christian
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
On 07/02/17 08:04 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/07/2017 12:02 AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>> (gdb) run
>>
>> Starting program: /usr/lib/firefox/./firefox
>> warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso32.so.1.
>> Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"
Could someone also test Firefox 51.0.1-1? My gdb closes after the command 'run'.
-- Christian
Sent from my iPhone
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 00:09, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, gdb has closed after the command 'run'. It's not possible to
> get a backtrace.
>
>> On 07 February 2017 a
On 02/07/2017 06:16 AM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote:
> Isn't there a logging feature that will capture it?
You don't get the backtrace from these logs. You need gdb for that.
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin -
Isn't there a logging feature that will capture it?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 4:09 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, gdb has closed after the command 'run'. It's not possible to
> get a backtrace.
>
>> On 07 February 2017 at 12:04 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wr
Unfortunately, gdb has closed after the command 'run'. It's not possible
to get a backtrace.
On 07 February 2017 at 12:04 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/07/2017 12:02 AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib/firefox/./firefox
warning: Could not load share
Hi Adrian,
apt-get install -t experimental firefox-dbgsym
Preparing to unpack .../firefox-dbgsym_51.0.1-1_powerpc.deb ...
Unpacking firefox-dbgsym (51.0.1-1) ...
Setting up firefox-dbgsym (51.0.1-1) ...
apt-get install -t experimental firefox-dev-dbgsym
Setting up firefox-dev (51.0.1-1) ...
Se
On 02/07/2017 12:02 AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> (gdb) run
>
> Starting program: /usr/lib/firefox/./firefox
> warning: Could not load shared library symbols for linux-vdso32.so.1.
> Do you need "set solib-search-path" or "set sysroot"?
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> Using hos
On 02/06/2017 11:36 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Which package should I install?
firefox-dbgsym should be enough. If not, installing the other
package as well shouldn't hurt either.
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet
On 02/06/2017 11:30 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Debug packages are delivered through different mirrors these days.
>
> Try this: https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
Note: The name of the debug package changes to "firefox-dbgsym".
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubit
Adrian,
Thanks for your hint.
apt-get install -t experimental firefox-dbg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package firefox-dbg is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obso
On 02/06/2017 11:28 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> There isn't a firefox-dbg package available.
Debug packages are delivered through different mirrors these days.
Try this: https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@d
There isn't a firefox-dbg package available.
My sources.list (/etc/apt/sources.list):
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian experimental main
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
Christian
On 06 February 2017 at 11:02 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/06/
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the hint. I am still learning. :-)
Cheers,
Christian
On 02/06/17 at 11:02 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 02/06/2017 10:39 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
bt
#0 0x1b1f5484 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
#1 0x1b1f5448 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libx
On 02/06/2017 10:39 PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> bt
>
> #0 0x1b1f5484 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
> #1 0x1b1f5448 in ?? () from /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so
> #2 0x in ?? ()
A backtrace without the Firefox debug package (firefox-dbg) isn't particularly
useful. You might w
Hi All,
I installed Firefox 51.0.1-1 with 'apt-get install -t experimental
firefox' on Debian Sid/experimental PowerPC (PPC32) today.
System: AmigaOne X1000 (Nemo board with P.A. Semi PA6T-1682M CPU)
Unfortunately it doesn't start.
Error messages:
Crash Annotation Graphi
Hi,
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 13:20 +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Hi,
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried Mesa 9.2.2-1 and 10.0.0-1 on Debian Sid and Lubuntu 13.10.
Unfortunately both have issued false colors in games. They appear to be ABGR
instead of RGBA,
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 13:20 +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
> Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've tried Mesa 9.2.2-1 and 10.0.0-1 on Debian Sid and Lubuntu 13.10.
> > Unfortunately both have issued false colors in games. They appear to be
Am 30.12.13 13:20, schrieb Riccardo Mottola:
Hi,
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried Mesa 9.2.2-1 and 10.0.0-1 on Debian Sid and Lubuntu 13.10.
Unfortunately both have issued false colors in games. They appear to
be ABGR
instead of RGBA, thus blue becomes green, red becomes
Hi,
Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried Mesa 9.2.2-1 and 10.0.0-1 on Debian Sid and Lubuntu 13.10.
Unfortunately both have issued false colors in games. They appear to be ABGR
instead of RGBA, thus blue becomes green, red becomes alpha etc.
With current Debian unstable, I have s
Hi all,
I've tried Mesa 9.2.2-1 and 10.0.0-1 on Debian Sid and Lubuntu 13.10.
Unfortunately both have issued false colors in games. They appear to be ABGR
instead of RGBA, thus blue becomes green, red becomes alpha etc.
Mesa 8.0.5-4 and Mesa 9.1.6 have no color problem.
I've cre
tag 667047 - wontfix
tag 667047 + upstream
tag 667047 + help
retitle 667047 no Base on powerpc (yet)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CACYvZ7jiXqF=m2
> None. There is none for 3.5. "Disabled." means disabled.
"Disabled" means "not for you"? Okay.
> As said, disabled since 3.5.0~rc1-1 because the database tests fail:
>
> [...]
> : &&
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/build/buildd-libreoffice_3.5.0~beta3-1-powerpc-DuEdKp/libreoffice-3.5.0~beta3/smoketesto
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:08:10PM -0400, Douglas Mencken wrote:
> And okay, which version shall I use? From apt-cache show?
None. There is none for 3.5. "Disabled." means disabled.
> > Yes, this *is* expected. Because Base is disabled because the database
> > checks
> > in the testsuite fa
This is how I got there...
** Installing a base system **
1st, I needed a CD I was sure I could boot off one of my p5 partitions..
Went ahead and got myself a pre-built d-i boot snapshot from
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/2006-03-21/powerpc64/netboot64/
(the one from today appar
I've just gotten X somewhat useably configured on a PowerBook 3400c but
X only occupies about 80% of the screen. I'm a Mac Linux newbie.
Using dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg (sid ) and choosing the Chips and
Technologies F65550,etc. I get the following.
Section "Device"
Identifier
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:06:59AM +0200, Cedric Pradalier wrote:
>
> I suggest you look at the examples in the man xmodmap.
i do not use xmodmap anymore, but xkb. Is there a way to do it?
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350
According to Maciej Jan Broniarz, on Fri, 28 May 2004 08:50:29 +0200,
>Hi,
>
>I want to swap my capslock and ctrl - i add :
>Option "XkbOptions""ctrl:swapcaps"
>
>to XF86Config but it is no good. Ctrl works like caps,
>but caps acts like some kind of shitf/caps combination.
>Does anyone kn
Hi,
I want to swap my capslock and ctrl - i add :
Option "XkbOptions""ctrl:swapcaps"
to XF86Config but it is no good. Ctrl works like caps,
but caps acts like some kind of shitf/caps combination.
Does anyone knows the solution ?
Best regards
gausus
--
[ ---< Maciej Jan Broniarz || [EM
Dear All,
Do you have any hints about running Debian/Sid on an Apple PowerBook
G4 12" 1.33Ghz laptop? The apple part number should be M9183F/A (for a
model with a french keyboard at least) - I bought a 512Mb RAM, so I
have 784Mb RAM in total, and 60Gb disk (and combo CDwriter).
I do run d
> > Not supported on powerpc. pmdisk is sort of supported (in 2.6,
> > experimental patch by BenH a few weeks back, I keep the patch updated for
> > my own use).
>
> Do you keep it up to date on a web site maybe ?
Nope. 'for my own use' doesn't imply that, does it?
First, Ben himself considers
On April 02, 11:04 (+0200), Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Not supported on powerpc. pmdisk is sort of supported (in 2.6,
> experimental patch by BenH a few weeks back, I keep the patch updated for
> my own use).
Do you keep it up to date on a web site maybe ?
--
Thomas Seyrat
> I am running SID on an ibook g3 800mhz. It runs very fine.
> Much better than a pc with celeron 700 :D
> I have used swsusp on PC an i would like to use it on
Not supported on powerpc. pmdisk is sort of supported (in 2.6,
experimental patch by BenH a few weeks back, I keep the patch updated for
Hello
I am running SID on an ibook g3 800mhz. It runs very fine.
Much better than a pc with celeron 700 :D
I have used swsusp on PC an i would like to use it on
an ibook. Google says that it
is suported by kernel 2.6 but i have no idea how to enable it.
There is no such named option
in the menuc
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 22:01, Andreakis, Dean (MED) wrote:
>
> I went ahead and commented out the dri section and the Load "dri", Load
> "GLcore" and Load "glx" lines in the "Module" section of XF86Config-4 to
> try and prevent the DRI drivers from loading but I still see the same
> messages in the
It's not the DRI per se... it's the radeon memory manager. it attempts
to statically allocate offscreen memory for use by the DRI, pixmaps,
etc. It has no effect on modes, so you can safely ignore it.
Alex
--- "Andreakis, Dean (MED)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I went ahead and comm
Alex,
I went ahead and commented out the dri section and the Load "dri", Load
"GLcore" and Load "glx" lines in the "Module" section of XF86Config-4 to
try and prevent the DRI drivers from loading but I still see the same
messages in the XF86 log file. Maybe I need to do something else to stop
DRI
this is from the DRI (front, back, and depth buffers) not the 2D driver
I think.
Alex
--- "Andreakis, Dean (MED)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (WW) RADEON (0): Static buffer allocation failed -- need at least
> 9216
> kB video memory
> (II) RADEON (0): Memory manager initialzed to (0,0) (10124
Ben,
Thanks again. I see the section in radeonfb.c you mentioned below:
You are probably hitting this:
>
> if ((var->xoffset + var->xres > var->xres_virtual)
> || (var->yoffset + var->yres > var->yres_virtual))
>return -EINVAL;
>
> In radeonfb fb_pan_display()
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 17:08, Andreakis, Dean (MED) wrote:
> Given this result I tried comparing the sections of code in the kernel
> fbdev driver and the XF86 radeon driver that sets up the PLL and there
> was just a few minor diff's in the default min/max values. I went ahead
> and changed these
Ben,
Thanks for the information. I used fbset -x and updated XF86Config-4
accordingly.
All of the test results from my original post were without using the
kernel fbdev driver. I just now went ahead and added Option "UseFBDev"
to the lcd-related device section in XF86Config-4 and set BusID to
0:1
> hing is ok.
>
> 2. On the iBook if I set both BusID's in both device sections to 0:10:0
> then X won't startup even though this is the ID reported by lspci for
> the ATI chip. If I just set the BusID in the device section associated
> with the external CRT to 0:10:0 then X will start and the co
Title: RE: Getting Dual Independent Heads to work on Debian(sid) on iBook
I dont really know driver or chipset in detail,
but its the way that it needs programming so
that the timing for the LCD does match. black
or striped or whatever effects do indcate
wront timing for the flat pane display
I am trying to enable dual independent heads on my iBook that has
Debian(sid) installed and XFree86 4.3.0.
The iBook has an ATI Mobility Radeon 7500 (M7) installed. In order to
alleviate configuration issues I set the same mode up successfully on my
Dell laptop with RH9 installed that also has
Pander,
Unfortunately they have removed mozilla 1.3-5 from the debian archives.
You'll either have to wait for the next 1.3.1 package or build it locally
from the current debian mozilla 1.3.1-1 sources with debian/rules edited
to use -O on ppc instead of -O2.
Jack
Citeren Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ps Also note that the mozilla 1.3.1-1 is broken in sid so you don't
> want to upgrade to that.
Oops, I've upgraded to that version, how can I downgrade with apt-get and do I
need to specify to
what version to downgrade?
Thanks,
Pander
--
Martin-Éric,
The debian packages are identical to the previous -02b packages
with the exception that they were built with a -02d installer binary
for jdk 1.3.1 instead of the old -02b one. I have not problems running
java applets here in mozilla and galeon under debian sid. You did install
the
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Claas Langbehn wrote:
> I have putten some self-built debian-packages online:
>
> - JDK (Java) (thanks to Jack Howarth)
I had tried Blackdown packages, but they forget to install the mime.types for
application/x-java-vm, which prevents Java applets from working in b
i rsync'd a benh kernel and config'd it according to a how-to for ibooks on
ibooklinux.net.
my default sid kernel is 2.4.18-newpmac and i wanted to enable scsi for
cd-burning, plus play with the benh kernel as i've listened to ALOT of the
dialogue here on-list...
at first i thought my kernel wa
> > I find that deb packages for potato are not really up to date. Eg. qt is in
> > v2.0, kde is not available.
>
> potato is the stable release so the most recent packages don't always
> get in there. you don't need to upgrade to sid though, you can upgrade
s/not always/never/ (unlss they fix sec
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 19:53, Chu J Tan wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why is there the need to upgrade to sid which is
> still in development?
> I find that deb packages for potato are not really up to date. Eg. qt is in
> v2.0, kde is not available.
> Can I download the source for KDE
> Can someone explain to me why is there the need to upgrade to sid which
> is still in development? I find that deb packages for potato are not
> really up to date. Eg. qt is in v2.0, kde is not available.
If you want up-to-date packages but don't want to deal with the vagaries
of unstable, I re
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:53:55AM -0800, Chu J Tan wrote:
> Can someone explain to me why is there the need to upgrade to sid which is
> still in development?
> I find that deb packages for potato are not really up to date. Eg. qt is in
> v2.0, kde is not available.
potato is the stable release s
Can someone explain to me why is there the need to upgrade to sid which is
still in development?
I find that deb packages for potato are not really up to date. Eg. qt is in
v2.0, kde is not available.
Can I download the source for KDE and compile it for my ibook? Is there a
different source for ppc
101 - 168 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
