no, I've not been hacking. I did upload sources for testing which
seemed to become mixed up with stable and testing sources showed
dselect as a separate package. Here's how it looks on stable/woody:
linux:~# dpkg -S `whereis dselect`
dpkg: *dselect:* not found.
dpkg: /usr/bin/dselect
dpkg: /usr/
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 18:46, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> It probably isn't, then. :) dselect used to be in the dpkg package, it only
> became its own package after Woody.
Hmm...but dpkg still Pre-Depends on dselect, so unless Joss hacked his
dpkg package, something is screwy...
All is OK now.
I did a
dpkg --clear-avail
and started a fresh source.list and all the dependencies were sorted
out.
there is something very uncomfortable about a broken woody...
joss
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 12:46:55AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 09:02, Joss Winn
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 09:02, Joss Winn wrote:
> I changed my sources.list file last night to include testing and
> then decided to change it back to how it was (stable).
>
> dselect then wanted to change a few things which looked harmless enough.
>
> now, if i 'apt-get update' 'apt-get upgrade'
I changed my sources.list file last night to include testing and
then decided to change it back to how it was (stable).
dselect then wanted to change a few things which looked harmless enough.
now, if i 'apt-get update' 'apt-get upgrade' everything looks fine and 0
packages need installing/removi
5 matches
Mail list logo
