On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 10:25, Mij wrote:
> I would like to have comments from people running kernels compiled on gcc3:
> stability, speed, compiletimings...
I've got my dmesg attached. I think I used gcc3.1, havn't tried with
3.2. Yet.
Yep, it's not bad with speed, I can'
I would like to have comments from people running kernels compiled on gcc3:
stability, speed, compiletimings...
bye
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:37:25PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 10:43, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > That's not correct. It can handle hand-written Altivec code but it
> > will not produce it automatically.
> speaking of this... I been playing around with the vector enabled ops i
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:37:25PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 10:43, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > That's not correct. It can handle hand-written Altivec code but it
> > will not produce it automatically.
> speaking of this... I been playing around with the vector enabled ops i
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 10:43, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> That's not correct. It can handle hand-written Altivec code but it
> will not produce it automatically.
speaking of this... I been playing around with the vector enabled ops in
os X and just tried them out in linux, but no dice. Are any of t
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:39:58PM +, matthew yee-king wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm probably going to put debian on my laptop (i've recently been converted
> from redhat/ yellowdog loyalties).
>
> just wondering if anyone knows much about gcc3 - for example, i
Hello!
I'm probably going to put debian on my laptop (i've recently been converted
from redhat/ yellowdog loyalties).
just wondering if anyone knows much about gcc3 - for example, i've heard it can
generated binaries optimised for altivec. if this is the case, would it be
po
7 matches
Mail list logo
