Re: horrible system performance using ide-scsi for cdrom on tibook

2001-09-19 Thread Rob Pfile
Following up to myself (again) the rest of this story belongs in the "no duh" category. i found that cdparanoia was niced down to 19 on my desktop machine while on the laptop it was set to 0 (using grip, which allows you to set a nice value for the ripper and encoder). i think this may have been

Re: horrible system performance using ide-scsi for cdrom on tibook

2001-09-11 Thread Rob Pfile
this helps, and i guess i can understand why, since it looks like that flag allows other interrupts to be serviced while the cdrom dma interrupts are being handled. however, the system goes from totally unusable to marginally usable after enabling this flag. in contrast there's no noticible load

Re: horrible system performance using ide-scsi for cdrom on tibook

2001-09-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
rob pfile wrote: > > I've posted on a similar topic before. the short story is that i could > not make the dvd/cdrom drive in the tibook work for audio extraction > unless i used the ide-scsi package. > > while that worked in the sense that cdparanoia could see the drive, > system performance dur

horrible system performance using ide-scsi for cdrom on tibook

2001-09-11 Thread rob pfile
I've posted on a similar topic before. the short story is that i could not make the dvd/cdrom drive in the tibook work for audio extraction unless i used the ide-scsi package. while that worked in the sense that cdparanoia could see the drive, system performance during cd ripping is terrible. the