Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:59:38PM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 13:03, Sven Luther wrote: > > > BTW, the real version of gnome you are wanting is 2.2, which is > > available for unstable, but not yet for testing, because the new libc6 > > is not yet in testing. So you can

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 09:44:18AM -0600, Rob Latham wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:11:25PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Did you try to run the new X apple released on top of OS X on top of MOL ? > > it doesn't quite work. XDarwin doesn't work either, but does give a > bit more informati

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Rob Latham
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:11:25PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Did you try to run the new X apple released on top of OS X on top of MOL ? it doesn't quite work. XDarwin doesn't work either, but does give a bit more information. I can only presume the same issue that keeps XDarwin from starting

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 14 février 2003, vers 14:11, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Did you try to run the new X apple released on top of OS X on top of > MOL ? I don't use OS X, so I haven't not tried this. -- BOFH excuse #281: The co-locator cannot verify th

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:46:51PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du vendredi 14 février 2003, vers > 10:47, Jean-Christophe Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > > Is it best to try to install Gnome 2 on woody or switch to testing ? > > Does mol (mac os 9.2) work w

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du vendredi 14 février 2003, vers 10:47, Jean-Christophe Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > Is it best to try to install Gnome 2 on woody or switch to testing ? > Does mol (mac os 9.2) work with testing ? BTW, mol is now able to run OS X. -- panic("IRQ, you lose.

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 13:03, Sven Luther wrote: > BTW, the real version of gnome you are wanting is 2.2, which is > available for unstable, but not yet for testing, because the new libc6 > is not yet in testing. So you can either try to rebuild your packages > for woody, if it is not already done

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:54:29PM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 11:47, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it's not a troll. I run successfully woody/benh on pwb Pismo (500 MHz) > > for some months, using Gnome 1.4. > > When I compare to mac OSX I'd like to have

Re: is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 11:47, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: > Hi, > > it's not a troll. I run successfully woody/benh on pwb Pismo (500 MHz) > for some months, using Gnome 1.4. > When I compare to mac OSX I'd like to have characters smoothing, > copy/paste working between apps (Mozilla/console/edit

is gnome 2 closer to OS X than 1.4 ?

2003-02-14 Thread Jean-Christophe Michel
Hi, it's not a troll. I run successfully woody/benh on pwb Pismo (500 MHz) for some months, using Gnome 1.4. When I compare to mac OSX I'd like to have characters smoothing, copy/paste working between apps (Mozilla/console/editors) and I wonder if Gnome2 would have this features. Is it best to tr