Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread Hartmut Koptein
> >I would say that this is version skid then, Intel had the dependency > >problem for a couple of weeks. > > > >Obviously PPC netbase is older than PPC netstd (and Intel netbase). > >Once the version skid resolves the problem should therefore clear up. > > Is there an automatic way of keeping t

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread Sergio Brandano
>I would say that this is version skid then, Intel had the dependency >problem for a couple of weeks. > >Obviously PPC netbase is older than PPC netstd (and Intel netbase). >Once the version skid resolves the problem should therefore clear up. Is there an automatic way of keeping the two distri

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread danielt
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Sergio Brandano wrote: > > I am now on an Intel platform, and my dpkg says: > > >Package: netbase > >Priority: standard > >Section: base > >Installed-Size: 1069 > >Maintainer: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Architecture: i386 > >Version: 3.16-7 > >Replaces: netstd (<<

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread Sergio Brandano
I am now on an Intel platform, and my dpkg says: >Package: netbase >Priority: standard >Section: base >Installed-Size: 1069 >Maintainer: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Architecture: i386 >Version: 3.16-7 >Replaces: netstd (<< 3.00) ^^ >Depends: tcpd, libc6 (>= 2.1)

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread danielt
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Sergio Brandano wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Recommended fix: reduce the dependency of netbase on netstd > >to a "suggests". > > netstd is labeled as obsolete > netbase still depends on netstd!!! > Then perhaps it should be reduced further. Obviously _someone

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread Sergio Brandano
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Recommended fix: reduce the dependency of netbase on netstd >to a "suggests". netstd is labeled as obsolete netbase still depends on netstd!!! Sergio

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread danielt
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Nathan Olsen wrote: > >I'm having some trouble not installing fingerd, rwhod and the rest of > >the r* gang. Trouble is that netstd 3.07-10 depends on them and > >netbase 3.16-2 in turn recommends netstd. dselect won't let me get > >rid of netstd without dumping netbase, too

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread Nathan Olsen
>I'm having some trouble not installing fingerd, rwhod and the rest of >the r* gang. Trouble is that netstd 3.07-10 depends on them and >netbase 3.16-2 in turn recommends netstd. dselect won't let me get >rid of netstd without dumping netbase, too (which, of course, I can't >do). >Is this a bug?

Re: netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-07 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
Michael G Schwern was said to been seen saying: > I'm having some trouble not installing fingerd, rwhod and the rest of > the r* gang. Trouble is that netstd 3.07-10 depends on them and > netbase 3.16-2 in turn recommends netstd. dselect won't let me get > rid of netstd without dumping netbase, t

netstd, fingerd and the r* gang

1999-12-06 Thread Michael G Schwern
I'm having some trouble not installing fingerd, rwhod and the rest of the r* gang. Trouble is that netstd 3.07-10 depends on them and netbase 3.16-2 in turn recommends netstd. dselect won't let me get rid of netstd without dumping netbase, too (which, of course, I can't do). Is this a bug? A fe