On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 04:55:02PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:24:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > someone who does the whole stuff, right ? It was an honest question, why do
> > you respond so agressively ?
>
> Maybe because the question was asked in a rather aggr
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:24:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> someone who does the whole stuff, right ? It was an honest question, why do
> you respond so agressively ?
Maybe because the question was asked in a rather aggressive tone? That's
at least what it looked to IMNSHO.
--
Fun will now co
On Sep 15, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 15 September 2006 19:02, Rick Thomas wrote:
When should I expect to be able to burn a working businesscard (or
netinst) CD?
The CD build starting in about 4 hours should have the changes. Not
sure
if it will be working :-)
Thanks!
On Friday 15 September 2006 19:02, Rick Thomas wrote:
> When should I expect to be able to burn a working businesscard (or
> netinst) CD?
The CD build starting in about 4 hours should have the changes. Not sure
if it will be working :-)
pgpoGD6EqlGmu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sep 15, 2006, at 4:53 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:44:02PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
<0>Rebooting in 180 seconds...
Maybe something wrong with the initrd? Or the new 2.6.17 kernel?
Actually it was a debian-cd bug. Should be fixed now, thanks
Thanks!
When should
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:52:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 14 September 2006 08:41, Sven Luther wrote:
> > /me wonders who is in charge of this breakage right now ?
>
> Well, at first glance it seems to me that this could be caused by the
> change from cramfs to initramfs for which
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:52:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 14 September 2006 08:41, Sven Luther wrote:
> > /me wonders who is in charge of this breakage right now ?
>
> Well, at first glance it seems to me that this could be caused by the
> change from cramfs to initramfs for which
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:44:02PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >The files in
> >http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/
> >powerpc/iso-cd/
> >date from September 4th.
> >
> >Just incase nobody's noticed...
>
> Well... Now
On Thursday 14 September 2006 08:41, Sven Luther wrote:
> /me wonders who is in charge of this breakage right now ?
Well, at first glance it seems to me that this could be caused by the
change from cramfs to initramfs for which _you_ proposed the patches, so
I would normally guess _you_ to deal
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:44:02PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> >The files in
> >http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/
> >powerpc/iso-cd/
> >date from September 4th.
> >
> >Just incase nobody's noticed...
>
> Well.
On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:06 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
The files in
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/
powerpc/iso-cd/
date from September 4th.
Just incase nobody's noticed...
Well... Now the files there are from September 13th, but the
businesscard ISO fails with
11 matches
Mail list logo
