Well, you not only need the sound chip spec, but you also
need to know how certain function are connected in the
particular machines, ...
All this asks for a a heavily modularized sound driver
design, not the big blob that dmasound is. The current
ALSA drivers are better in this regard, I
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Yes, I was just looking what happens. Deep inside I was hoping that
recording capability might perhaps be added with not too much effort.
How about Darwin, couldn't we borrow some code of their driver, or
is this code not freely available?
I doubt it, but as Segher
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 10:18, Heinz Kirchmann wrote:
...
They aren't conflicting. HAS_RECORD defines whether the code for
recording is built in at all, dmasound.mach.record says whether
recording is supported for the machine it's running on.
Yes, but we have two different concepts for the
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 23:34, Heinz Kirchmann wrote:
I tried to collect some info, why the dmasound driver does not work
correctly on my iBook2. Besides the fact, that recording is not possible
with the standard dmasound_pmac and dmasound_core drivers, I noticed
problems with audacity, too.
Hi,
I tried to collect some info, why the dmasound driver does not work
correctly on my iBook2. Besides the fact, that recording is not possible
with the standard dmasound_pmac and dmasound_core drivers, I noticed
problems with audacity, too. After calling audacity (version 1.0.1)
neither
5 matches
Mail list logo