On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:47:30AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 11-06-09 at 11:51pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
There is an upcoming libjpeg transition from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update libgs-dev to
Depends and/or Build-Depends on
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package ghostscript
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #343901 (http://bugs.debian.org/343901)
# *
On 11-07-07 at 03:23pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:47:30AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 11-06-09 at 11:51pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
There is an upcoming libjpeg transition from libjpeg62 to
libjpeg8. As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:32:42 +
with message-id e1qewbe-0004yb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#629967: fixed in ghostscript 9.02~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #629967,
regarding libgs-dev: Please Depends/Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
to be
Accepted:
ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-3_amd64.deb
to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-cups_9.02~dfsg-3_amd64.deb
ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-3_amd64.deb
to main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript-dbg_9.02~dfsg-3_amd64.deb
ghostscript-doc_9.02~dfsg-3_all.deb
to
