Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 18.03:16, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > For Wheezy we should probably aim for the uglier but much simpler > > > solution. the "master" branch is not intended for Wheezy, I will > > > use a separate "master-wheezy" for that. > > > > I think I disagree. The patch I p

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-29 at 05:07pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.17:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in > > > ghostscript-cups what has been done for most packages ship

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-29 at 05:10pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a > > > écrit : > > > > A nice solution to this bug is I

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.40:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups > > > what has been done for m

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 15.17:39, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups > > what has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers: transform > > the postinst code into a dpk

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-29 at 02:33pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups > > what has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers: > > transform the postinst code into

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-29 at 02:20pm, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le vendredi, 27 juillet 2012 14.23:27, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > severity 520753 serious > > thanks > > > > On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > > Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when > > > /etc/cups/ppd

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 29 juillet 2012 14.20:45, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit : > A nice solution to this bug is IMHO to replicate in ghostscript-cups what > has been done for most packages shipping Cups drivers: transform the > postinst code into a dpkg trigger and let the Cups postinst do the job "as > cup

Bug#520753: Potential serious bug on ghostscript-cups

2012-07-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le vendredi, 27 juillet 2012 14.23:27, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > severity 520753 serious > thanks > > On 12-07-27 at 11:48am, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > > Bug 520753 is about a faillure in postinst script when /etc/cups/ppd > > is not present. i am tented to raise this bug as serious, because t

Re: SpliX from Debian merged into Ubuntu

2012-07-29 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 8 juillet 2012 15.06:15, Till Kamppeter a écrit : > Hi, > > I have merged the newest Debian package of SpliX into Ubuntu. Following > changes I have done in Ubuntu and I recommend to get them also into the > Debian package to be able to use identical (source) packages in Debian > and