[bts-link] source package ghostscript

2012-08-06 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package ghostscript # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #310203 (http://bugs.debian.org/310203) # Bug title: gs-common: dumphint-script do

Processed: [bts-link] source package ghostscript

2012-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package ghostscript > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debi

Processed: your mail

2012-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 531624 ghostscript should not use private libicc Bug #531624 [ghostscript] Should link against libicc package Changed Bug title to 'ghostscript should not use private libicc' from 'Should link against libicc package' > thanks Stopping pro

Processed: Fixes upstream

2012-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Tags 531624 + upstream Bug #531624 [ghostscript] Should link against libicc package Added tag(s) upstream. > Tags 531624 + fixed-upstream Bug #531624 [ghostscript] Should link against libicc package Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > Tags 531624 + con

Bug#531624: Fixes upstream

2012-08-06 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Tags 531624 + upstream Tags 531624 + fixed-upstream Tags 531624 + confirmed Thanks Master d8ca80d fixed upstream by using libcms2 (9.06) Bastion