Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken from
> the system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not know
> whether all of these libraries are actually available in Debian or
> whether there are some being newer in U
Jonas, thank you for the info.
GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries taken from the
system, no convenience code is used any more. But I do not know whether
all of these libraries are actually available in Debian or whether there
are some being newer in Ubuntu than in Debian or
Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 12:48:36)
> is Ghostscript in Debian still maintained?
Yes.
> Or is there anything in Ghostscript 9.06 and newer which does not
> allow its use in Debian? If so please tell the problem or report it
> directly upstream (and please post the upstream bug links h
Hi,
is Ghostscript in Debian still maintained? Or is there anything in
Ghostscript 9.06 and newer which does not allow its use in Debian? If so
please tell the problem or report it directly upstream (and please post
the upstream bug links here). If Ghostscript as it is now is not
suitable for Debi
Hi,
first, sorry for making a broken commit into the CUPS GIT repository. I
have simply overtaken a patch from a co-worker. I have fixed this patch
now, removing the Ubuntu defaults, adding the missing patch and making
the patch Ubuntu-only, as it is a temporary override of a failing test
which pr
Hello Brian,
I tested it on debian wheezy amd64 (cups version 1.5.3-5) and debian
testing (cups version 1.6.3-1). This problem did not occur. Seams like it's
fixed in stable and testing. Haven't checked unstable.
Henri
2013/8/12 Brian Potkin
> tags 619592 moreinfo
> thanks
>
>
> On Fri 25 Mar
