Bug#813043: please multiarchify the libhpmud library packages

Package: src:hplip Version: 3.15.11+repack0-1 Tags: patch User: d...@debian.org Usertags: multiarch patch at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/235584730/hplip_3.15.11+repack0-1_3.15.11+repack0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz

Bug#813029: hplip: Can't apt-get install hplip because of python<3.5 dependance

Package: hplip Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Trying to install the hplip tools with apt-get install hplip. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or

Re: Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

Quoting Till Kamppeter (2016-01-28 20:41:27) > On 01/28/2016 12:57 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. Easier to track if you file a bugreport >> about this. > > Here we go: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813021 Thanks :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smed

Re: Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

On 01/28/2016 12:57 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. Easier to track if you file a bugreport about this. Here we go: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813021 Till

Bug#813021: Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

Package: ghostscript Version: 9.16~dfsg-2.1 Matthias Klose from Ubuntu has added multi-arch extensions for the libgs of Ghostscript. The patch from Ubuntu is here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/235445264/ghostscript_9.16~dfsg~0-0ubuntu3_9.16~dfsg~0-0ubuntu4.diff.gz Can this be added to the De

Re: Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

Hi Till, Quoting Till Kamppeter (2016-01-28 20:00:08) > Matthias Klose from Ubuntu has added multi-arch extensions for the > libgs of Ghostscript. The patch is here: > > http://launchpadlibrarian.net/235445264/ghostscript_9.16~dfsg~0-0ubuntu3_9.16~dfsg~0-0ubuntu4.diff.gz > > Jonas, can you adopt

Multi-arch extensions for Ghostscript

Hi, Matthias Klose from Ubuntu has added multi-arch extensions for the libgs of Ghostscript. The patch is here: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/235445264/ghostscript_9.16~dfsg~0-0ubuntu3_9.16~dfsg~0-0ubuntu4.diff.gz Jonas, can you adopt them into the Debian package so that we can sync the Debi

ghostscript_9.16~dfsg-2.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:39:05 +0100 Source: ghostscript Binary: ghostscript ghostscript-x ghostscript-doc libgs9 libgs9-common libgs-dev ghostscript-dbg Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 9.16~dfsg-2.1 Distribution: u

Bug#809939: marked as done (ghostscript: FTBFS with libpng16)

Your message dated Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:19:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#809939: fixed in ghostscript 9.16~dfsg-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #809939, regarding ghostscript: FTBFS with libpng16 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w