Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package ghostscript
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debi
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:35:14 +0200
Source: jbig2dec
Binary: libjbig2dec0-dev libjbig2dec0 jbig2dec
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Printing Team
Changed
Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 18:31:50)
> On 16.05.2016 19:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 17:17:04)
>>> Patch (against 0.13-1) attached.
>>
>> I believe your patch is flawed, however: the arch-specific jbig2dec
>> package should not be marked "foreig
jbig2dec_0.13-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jbig2dec_0.13-2.dsc
jbig2dec_0.13-2.debian.tar.xz
jbig2dec-dbgsym_0.13-2_amd64.deb
jbig2dec_0.13-2_amd64.deb
libjbig2dec0-dbgsym_0.13-2_amd64.deb
libjbig2dec0-dev_0.13-2_amd64.deb
libjbig2dec0_0.13-
jbig2dec_0.13-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
jbig2dec_0.13-2.dsc
jbig2dec_0.13-2.debian.tar.xz
jbig2dec-dbgsym_0.13-2_amd64.deb
jbig2dec_0.13-2_amd64.deb
libjbig2dec0-dbgsym_0.13-2_amd64.deb
libjbig2dec0-dev_0.13-2_amd64.deb
libjbi
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2016 16:56:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#799916: fixed in jbig2dec 0.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #799916,
regarding libjbig2dec0 is not Multi-Arch compatible
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Mon, 16 May 2016 16:56:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#824483: fixed in jbig2dec 0.13-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #824483,
regarding libjbig2dec0: unused and unrelated Memento memory debugging code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
FYI: The status of the hplip source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.16.3+repack0-1
Current version: 3.16.5+repack0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source jbig2dec
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'jbig2dec'
Limit currently set to 'source':'jbig2dec'
> tags 824483 + pending
Bug #824483 [libjbig2dec0] libjbig2dec0: unused and unrelated Memento memory
debu
On 16.05.2016 19:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Yuriy,
Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 17:17:04)
Patch (against 0.13-1) attached.
I believe your patch is flawed, however: the arch-specific jbig2dec
package should not be marked "foreign" as it is unusable by foreign
architectures.
It
Hi Yuriy,
Quoting Yuriy M. Kaminskiy (2016-05-16 17:17:04)
> Patch (against 0.13-1) attached.
Thanks!
I believe your patch is flawed, however: the arch-specific jbig2dec
package should not be marked "foreign" as it is unusable by foreign
architectures.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idea
Package: libjbig2dec0
Version: 0.13-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed that since ~0.12 libjbig2dec0.{a,so*} library includes
unused (and impossible to enable by library users) and unrelated Memento
memory debugging code.
Patch (against 0.13-1) attached.
-- System Informa
Control: tags -1 patch
thanks
Patch (against 0.13-1) attached.
diff -Nru jbig2dec-0.13/debian/control jbig2dec-0.13/debian/control
--- jbig2dec-0.13/debian/control2016-05-10 17:52:21.0 +0300
+++ jbig2dec-0.13/debian/control2016-05-16 18:05:53.0 +0300
@@ -24,6 +24,7
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #799916 [libjbig2dec0] libjbig2dec0 is not Multi-Arch compatible
Added tag(s) patch.
--
799916: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799916
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Thank you for your contribution.
I have added the documentation for the pdfAutorotate option to the
README file in the upstream repository now, BZR rev. 7461.
Till
On Sun 15 May 2016 at 19:20:19 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote:
> Although pdfAutorotate was introduced in cups-filters 1.0.25 it is not
> documented anywhere. I would suggest the README is as good a place as
> any. My suggestion is:
>
> A PDF file containing pages with page width greater than page h
16 matches
Mail list logo
