Does "gnome-control-center printers" perform calls as root without
requiring "unlock" to user?
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at lists.debian.org archives.
El 28/11/16 a les 21:49, Brian Potkin ha escrit:
> On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 21:
Le lundi, 28 novembre 2016, 17.07:14 h CET Till Kamppeter a écrit :
> On 11/28/2016 03:29 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
> > I added root to SystemGroup in cups-files and restarted cups. A queue
> > was paused with cupsdisable. From g-c-c it was possible to cancel the
> > job without unlocking the printin
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 03:21:17 +0100
Source: ghostscript
Binary: ghostscript ghostscript-x ghostscript-doc libgs9 libgs9-common
libgs-dev ghostscript-dbg
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 9.20~dfsg-1
Distribution: uns
ghostscript_9.20~dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ghostscript_9.20~dfsg-1.dsc
ghostscript_9.20~dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
ghostscript-dbg_9.20~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript-doc_9.20~dfsg-1_all.deb
ghostscript-x_9.20~dfsg-1_amd64.deb
ghostscript_9.20
On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 21:40:55 +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> How is this related to non-root users capability to cancel jobs through
> "gnome-control-center printers" ?
Intimately.
--
Brian.
How is this related to non-root users capability to cancel jobs through
"gnome-control-center printers" ?
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at lists.debian.org archives.
El 28/11/16 a les 18:29, Brian Potkin ha escrit:
> On Fri 25 Nov
On 11/28/2016 03:29 PM, Brian Potkin wrote:
To continue this train of thought and hopefully add something of
substance
I added root to SystemGroup in cups-files and restarted cups. A queue
was paused with cupsdisable. From g-c-c it was possible to cancel the
job without unlocking the printing di
On Fri 25 Nov 2016 at 15:48:31 +, Brian Potkin wrote:
> On Fri 25 Nov 2016 at 13:35:26 +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, desktop printers tools should trigger actions as same
> > desktop user account.
> > lpadmin group ever should be allowed on all related features.
>
> If roo
equipos para la venta
en transmaquina estamos constantemente evolucionando buscando nuevas formas de
prestarles servicios a nuestros clientes, es por esto que queremos presentarles
nuestra división de venta de equipos.
actualmente contamos a la fecha con una cartera importante de equipos
dispo
